X Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction X Were the methods

X were there methods to minimize errors in data

This preview shows page 41 - 45 out of 64 pages.

Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently? X Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction? X Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? X Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? X Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data? X Were the specific directives for new research appropriate? X Overall appraisal: Include x Exclude Seek further info Critical Checklist for Systematic Reviews Reviewer: Dana Gill Date: March 1, 2019
Image of page 41
42 Running Head: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE PROPOSAL Author: Kingston et al. Year: 2016 Yes No Unclear Not applicable Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated? X Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question? X Was the search strategy appropriate? X Were the sources and resources used to search for studies adequate? X Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate? X Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently? X Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction? X Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? X Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? X Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data? X Were the specific directives for new research appropriate? X Overall appraisal: Include x Exclude Seek further info Critical Checklist for Systematic Reviews
Image of page 42
43 Running Head: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE PROPOSAL Reviewer: Dana Gill Date: March 1, 2019 Author: Luangasanatip et al. Year: 2015 Yes No Unclear Not applicable Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated? X Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question? X Was the search strategy appropriate? X Were the sources and resources used to search for studies adequate? X Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate? X Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently? X Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction? X Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? X Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? X Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data? X Were the specific directives for new research appropriate? X Overall appraisal: Include x Exclude Seek further info Critical Checklist for Systematic Reviews
Image of page 43
44 Running Head: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE PROPOSAL Reviewer: Dana Gill Date: March 1, 2019 Author: Neo et al. Year: 2016 Yes No Unclear Not applicable 1. Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated? X Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question? X Was the search strategy appropriate? X Were the sources and resources used to search for studies adequate? X Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate? X Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently? x Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction? X Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate?
Image of page 44
Image of page 45

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture