Page6of8facilitate the participation of poor and vulnerable populations in the design andimplementation of development policies and programs.Negative roleOrigins of the rights based approach to manage development can be followed back to the1948 All-inclusive Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Article 25 (1) of the UniversalAssertion of Human Rights communicates that, everyone has the benefit to a lifestylesufficient for the wellbeing and prosperity of himself and of his family, including food,clothing, housing and clinical consideration and fundamental social administrations, andthe privilege to security in case of joblessness, infection, incapacity, widowhood, matureage or other absence of work in conditions outside his ability to control. Often this is takenas the reason for rights based methodology in that it ensures each individual a case to acertain degree of prosperity not as an issue of noble cause, yet as an issue of right. Thispermits development strategies to be inclusive to everybody.Whether via strict media oversight or burdensome regulatory hurdles for CSOs,governments in numerous countries are restricting the space for civil society–particularlyin the arena of advancing human rights or democratic principles (Brynard, 2006).Steps tosuppress or curb civil society freedoms include limiting access to national and foreignfunding, erecting barriers to mobile communications, and applying onerous, arbitrary orpoorly administrated registration processes. Beyond steps taken by specific nationalgovernments, international civil society leaders have identified a more general decline infunding available for advocacy, rights-based activities, or “causes that challenge thestatus quo”. While many of these measures may not constitute overt acts such as bans,civil society leaders say the implications of these more subtly administered restrictionsextend beyond specific activities to hinder the development of democratic governance,accountability and stability over the long term (Althauset al,2013) .There are suggestions too for the willingness of the private segment to participate in socialobligation programs, specifically in association with civil society associations, in areas