These groups will be evaluated for the impact of using a sepsis protocol and

These groups will be evaluated for the impact of

This preview shows page 13 - 16 out of 21 pages.

implemented interventions with success rates on mortality. A quasi-experimental design study measures nonrandomized assignments with the casual impact of the research intervention on a specific population. This type of study design was selected for a number of reasons. This design will allow the opportunity to compare results of before and after implementation of a specific intervention. The outcome will measure successful mortality rates by implementing timely interventions for organizations that used a sepsis protocolduring triage at the early recognition of sepsis. The results for a number of mortality for a given number of patients’ will be collected and comparison can be made with organization groups that 13
IMPACT OF EMERGENCY DEPARMENT SEPSIS PROTOCOL use standard care measures, where no baseline protocol was initiated. One advantage with the use of this approach is that the quasi-experimental design is cohesive with discrete case studies, as the results are usually reinforced from case study findings. This will give advantage of having a statistical investigation breakdown. One disadvantage is the possibility of issues with internal validity, as the control groups and treatments may not be compared with the baseline results (Chamberlain College of Nursing, 2017).Sampling MethodThe sampling of the target population, is adult patients ages 18 and over presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with sepsis symptoms over a 1-year period. The surveyor and data collectors will complete their required training prior to reviewing the study results. The project will typically seek towards a nonrandom sampling, using a nonprobability approach to sample the adult patients who receive effective treatment in a timely basis because of the use of evidence-based practice measures for sepsis. Patients that met the criteria for the specified project period will be automatically in the inclusion and ones who didn’t were in the exclusion group. Consecutive and convenience sampling included a small population of 100-patients in the sample size for prospective observation. An assessment tool, provided by the SSC, was provided to nurses in the ED and triage as a guide to identify patients presenting to the ED with possible sepsis symptoms. The tool will be used on all adult patients 18-years-old and older that qualify for these measures. The inclusion was that patients met two or more of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria, indication of organ dysfunction and/or a potential source of infection as guided by evidence-based core measures (Society of Critical CareMedicine, 2016). 14
IMPACT OF EMERGENCY DEPARMENT SEPSIS PROTOCOL One advantage to the selection of this sample approach, is that all the patients and individuals that are available can all be included in the study, where this will list a sample representative for the complete population area. Another advantage of using this sampling

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture