The fundamental change in marriage that threatens

The fundamental change in marriage that threatens absurdity is whether two person of the same sex,
not sexually involved with each other can get married, heterosexual couple sure have but we take as a
given that they are sexually involved. Can an alternative form of marriage, the asexual marriage, be given
legitimacy? Is it evidence of an autopoeitic change in western thought from marriage being an almost
completely emotional relationship between two people of opposite sex to marriage being an economic
relationship in total disregard of the sexual? The development of marriage through the fashioning of
divorce relief has predominantly being within the economics of the marriage.

Question No.1
Question No.2
That Tennessee must recognize same sex marriage legal in another state does rest on Article 4, full faith
and credit. As I have said herein, the current iteration of the marital relationship was created by the
rights accorded in divorce actions. From the granting of maintenance/alimony to equitable distribution,
these rights and expectations define marriage. Justice Ginsberg clarification that article 4 full faith and
credit clause have always been directed towards judgments from another state is correct but it does not
weaken its application. Should the same sex couple get divorce in a state that recognized same sex
marriage is Tennessee under the obligation to recognize the judgment and can it recognize the judgment
without recognizing the underlying dissolved marriage? Tennessee must give full faith and credit to a
same sex divorce from another state and must recognize the marriage prior to divorce.
SOCIAL REGULATION THROUGH REFLEXIVE LAW
10
10 Teubner, Gunther; law as an Autopoietic System, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford UK, 1993, Chapter 5

that Scott and all other enslaved Africans, were not accorded rights under, nor were they recognized as
being a part of the social life protected by the Constitution. Enslavement was an extant part of pre-