4 blocks not enough, quick break
could go either way, bar too far
Ira S. Bushey
Drunk seaman turns wheel, sinks
dock, US gov't held liable, used related risk test, foresight test, and 'location of
the wrong' test; likely 'deep pockets'
Relationship
Less clear relationship, e.g.,
independent contractors
Apparent authority
"Holding out" - the principal
"holds out" the agents as employees with responsibilities (ala HMO with doctors)
Justifiable reliance - similar to estoppel, patients rely on that holding out
Implied
authority
If the principal has enough control to be considered
respondeat
superior
, control is being exerted with certain procedures Doctor makes ultimate
decision, but VL on the fringe, HMO has control Either test can prove a VL
relationship
Petrovich
Doctor does not catch cancer, patient sues HMO, HMO
held liable because it was both an apparent authority and an implied authority
Justif
- "cheapest cost avoider," incentives, deep pockets, protects 3d parties, but
clashes with contr. justice, indiv. responsibility and common sense VL and Intent
torts: Could go either way, depending on how much the employer knows of the
offending action
Nuisance
Move from SL to negl., intentionality, or abnormally
dangerous
R2
: "There is liab. for a nuisance only to those to whom it causes
significant harm, of a kind that would be suffred by a normal person in the
community or by property in normal condition and used for a normal purpose."
Ex: drive-in might be held "hyper sensitive" to light product; but TV screen
nuisanced by radiation (TV=common)
Common
nuisance: fumes, stenches,
pollution, sprays
Must
be
"intentional and unreasonable" 2 "reasonable" stand.;
RS: "gravity of the harm outweighs the utility of the actor's conduct,"
Prah
;
Live/let live (
de minimis
threshold): certain thres. betw. liv/let liv and reciprocity,
below=no L, above SL,
Fontainebleu
Injunctive relief:
Crts. hesit. to inj.; risks:
parties'd waste resor. barg. surp.; strategic beh.'d stop settlement (e.g. homeowner
w/$100 dam. and entit. to $2 million co); typically not used for incr. risk of harm
(halfway house)
Aff. def
: extra sensitivity, "coming to the nuisance"
Coase
and
nuisance law
Matrix
I. Injunction/Nuisance Fac. can't pollute w/o po. allow.,
otherwise inj.; can trade entitl. for bribe; pollute if prof. (fac. bribe)>subj. dam.
Ensign
- inj better than dam if po. subj. damage high;
Prah
- min. view, rej
FB
,
functional value? II. Dam/Nuisance Fac. can pollute; but must pay "objective"
dam. of house owner, will pollute if prof.>obj. dam.
Boomer
- cement plant
cannot be enjoined, but po get "permanent dam" III. Injunction, No Nuisance
Fac. can pollute at will and will only stop if bribed not to; will pollute unless
subj. dam (k to stop)>prof.
Fountainbleu
- No entitle. to sunshine/air, no dam can
be brought IV. Dam, No Nuisance Po. may stop fac., but must compensate lost
prod.; will pollute if profits>subj. dam.
Spurr
- "Purchased injunction," get inj. if
po. wants it enough
Transaction costs
More than one homeowner=collective
bargaining; hold-out/freeloaders; imperfect information; animosity Tendency to
not bargain after nuisance dec. (20 close call cases in article): nature of advoc

You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read both pages?
- Spring '19