3 0 N Solinger Hofmans and W van Olffen The D11amic Microstmcture of

3 0 n solinger hofmans and w van olffen the d11amic

This preview shows page 27 - 29 out of 29 pages.

3 0. N. Solinger,]. Hofmans, and W. van Olffen, "The D}11amic Microstmcture of Organizational Commitment," Journal ofOcrupational and Orga- nizational P,ydwlogy 88 (2015): 773-96. "See L. S. Glasman and D. Ablarracfn, "Forming Attitudes That Predict Future Behavior: A Meta- Analysis of the Attitude-Behavior Relation," Psy- dwlogical Bulletin 132, no. 5 (2006): 778-822. "L. Festinger and J. M. Carlsmith, "Cognitive Consequences of Forced Compliance," journal of Abnomwl and Socia/Psychology 58 (1959): 203-10. 15 See, for instance, L. R. Fabrigar, R. E. Petty, S. M. Smith, and S. L. Crites, "Understand- ing Knowledge Effects on Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Role of Relevance, Com- plexity, and Amount of Knowledge," journal of Personality and Soria/ Psycholo gy 90, no. 4 (2006): 556-77; and D.J. Schleicher,J. D. Watt, and G. . J. Greguras, "Reexamining the Job Satisfaction-Performance Relationship: The Complexity of Attitudes," Journal of Applied Psycholo gy 89, no. 1 (2004): 165-77. 7 A. S. McCance, C. D. Nye, L. Wang, K. S. Jones, and C. Chiu, "Alleviating the Burden of Emotional Labor: The Role of Social Sharing," journal of1Wanage111ent, February 2013, 392-415. 8 Glasman and Albarracfn, "Forming Attitudes That Predict Future Behavior"; K. B. Starzyk, L. R. Fabrigar, A. S. Soryal, andJ.J. Fanning, "A Painful Reminder: The Role of Level and Salience of Attitude Importance in Cognitive Dissonance," Personality and Social Psycholo gy Bulletin 35, no. 1 (2009): 126-37. 9 D. A. Harrison, D. A. Newman, and P. L. Roth, "How Important AreJob Attitudes? Meta- analytic Comparisons of Integrative Behavioral Outcomes and Time Sequences," Amdemy of lvlanagementjournal49 (2006): 305-25; D. A. Nemnan, D. L..Joseph, and C. L. Hulin, ''.Job Attitudes and Employee Engagement: Consid- ering the Attitude 'A-Factor,"' in S. L. Albrecht (ed.), Handbook a/Employee Engagement:Perspec- tives, Issues, Research andPractice (Northampton, lvL.\: Edward Elgar, 2010): 43-61. 10 S. P. Brown, "A Meta-Analysis and Review of Organizational Research on.Job Involvement," Psychological Bulletin 120, no. 2 (1996): 235-55; T. M. Lodahl and M. Kejner, "The Definition and Measurement ofJob Involvement," jonrnal of/,jJjJlied Psycholo gy 49, no. 1 (1965): 24-33. 11 G. M. Spreitzer, "Psychological Empower� ment in the Workplace: Construct Definition, Measurement, and Validation," Academy of 1Wmwgement Journal 38 (1995): 1442-65; G. M. Spreitzer, "Taking Stock: A Review of More Than Twenty Years of Research on Empower� ment at \Vork," inJ. Barling and C. L. Cooper (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008): 54-72. 12 S. E. Seibert, G. Wang, and S. H. Courtright, "Antecedents and Consequences of Psycho- logical and Team Empowerment in Organi- zations: A Meta-Analytic Review," journal of AjJjJlied Psycholo gy 96, no. 5 (2011): 981-1003. 13 z. A. Mercurio, "Affective Commitment as a Core Essence of Organizational Commitment: An Integrative Literature Review," Human Resourre Develojnnent Review 14, no. 4 (2015): 389-414; 0. N. Solinger, W. van Olffen, and R. A. Roe, "Beyond the Three-Component Model of Organizational Commitment," jour- nal of AjJjJlied Psychology 93 (2008): 70-83.
Image of page 27
100 PART 2 The Individual 14 A. Cooper-Hakim and C. Viswesvaran. "The Construct of Work Commitment: Testing an Integrative Framework," Psychological Bul- letin 131, no. 2 (2005): 241-59; Solinger, van
Image of page 28
Image of page 29

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read all 29 pages?

  • Spring '10
  • TUCKER
  • supervisor, Job Involvement

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture