Course Hero Logo

In bruces case in preparation for the scan a nurse

  • No School
  • AA 1
  • trishalumb
  • 56

Course Hero uses AI to attempt to automatically extract content from documents to surface to you and others so you can study better, e.g., in search results, to enrich docs, and more. This preview shows page 32 - 35 out of 56 pages.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………..……In Bruce’s case, in preparation for the scan a nurse was supposed to give Bruce tap watercombined with a fluid used to enhance contrast in medical images. As Bruce was ‘nil bymouth’ the nurse injected the mixture intravenously. Due to the inadvertent administration oftap water intravenously, Bruce’s septicaemia worsened; requiring admission to the intensivecare unit where he has required invasive monitoring and support.12.Was Bruce owed a duty of care? And if so, by whom? Who else in Bruce’s case may beowed a duty of care?………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………13.How would the Court determine what the standard of care was?………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……..31
2805NRS: Legal & Ethical Principles in Healthcare14.How might the Court determine if Bruce’s injury was caused by the breach of duty?……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..…15.What defences might be raised to defend an allegation of negligence? What relevancedoes this have for your future role as a healthcare practitioner?……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………END OF TUTORIAL 732
2805NRS: Legal & Ethical Principles in HealthcareTUTORIAL 8Assisted Suicide and the Doctrine of Double EffectOverviewThis module introduces students to:the law surrounding assisted suicide and the doctrine of doubleeffectthe law surrounding withholding and withdrawing Life sustainingmeasures &criminal law and healthcare practiceLearningOutcomesAt the end of this tutorial, you will be able to:Define the terms euthanasia and assisted suicideIdentify the difference between active and passive euthanasiaExplain the doctrine of double effectExplain the legal implications of an Advance DirectiveDiscuss the law as it relates to abortionIdentify how healthcare practitioners may breach criminal law intheir practicePre-TutorialActivitiesReview:Online Course Content:Module 5Read:Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) s 311 & s282A s285 & s288Kerridge, I.H., Lowe, M., & Stewart, C. (2013).Ethics and law for thehealth professions(4th ed.). Sydney, Australia: Federation Press.R v Adams[1957] Crim LR 365R v Cox(1992) BMLR 38R v Neilsen[2012] QSC 29Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service v Q[2016] QSC 89Duckett, S. (2017). Knowing, Anticipating, Even Facilitating but Still notIntending: Another Challenge to Double Effect Reasoning.Journal of bioethicalinquiry, 1-5.

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

End of preview. Want to read all 56 pages?

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Term
Fall
Professor
NoProfessor
Tags
Legal Ethical Principles in Healthcare

Newly uploaded documents

Show More

Newly uploaded documents

Show More

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture