2254 seminole tribe of florida v florida 517 us 44

Info icon This preview shows pages 420–422. Sign up to view the full content.

2254 Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1996) (Article I powers may not be used to abrogate a state’s Eleventh Amendment immunity, but Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, 427 U.S. 445 (1976), holding that Congress may abrogate Eleventh Amend- ment immunity in exercise of Fourteenth Amendment enforcement power, remains good law). See discussion pp. 1533–37. 2255 527 U.S. 627 (1999). 2256 527 U.S. at 639–46. See also College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Post- secondary Educ. Expense Bd., , 527 U.S. 666 (1999) (Trademark Remedy Clarifica- tion Act amendment to Lanham Act subjecting states to suits for false advertising is not a valid exercise of Fourteenth Amendment power; neither the right to be free from a business competitor’s false advertising nor a more generalized right to be secure in one’s business interests qualifies as a “property” right protected by the Due Process Clause). 2257 528 U.S. 62 (2000). Again, the issue of the Congress’s power under § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment arose because sovereign immunity prevents private ac- tions against states from being authorized under Article I powers such as the com- merce clause. 2252 AMENDMENT 14—RIGHTS GUARANTEED
Image of page 420

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

crimination by states, finding that there is a rational basis for states to use age as a proxy for other qualities, abilities and characteris- tics. 2258 Noting the lack of a sufficient legislative record establish- ing broad and unconstitutional state discrimination based on age, the Court found that the ADEA, as applied to the states, was “so out of proportion to a supposed remedial or preventive object that it cannot be understood as responsive to or designed to prevent un- constitutional behavior.” 2259 Despite what was considered by many to be a better developed legislative record, the Court in Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett 2260 also rejected the recovery of money damages against states, this time under of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). 2261 Title I of the ADA prohibits employers, including states, from “discriminating against a qualified individual with a disabil- ity” 2262 and requires employers to “make reasonable accommoda- tions [for] . . . physical or mental limitations . . . . unless [to do so] . . . would impose an undue hardship on the . . . business.” 2263 Although the Court had previously overturned discriminatory legis- lative classifications based on disability in City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center , 2264 the Court had held that determinations of when states had violated the Equal Protection Clause in such cases were to be made under the relatively deferential standard of rational ba- sis review. Thus, failure of an employer to provide the kind “reason- able accommodations” required under the ADA would not generally rise to the level of a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, and instances of such failures did not qualify as a “history and pattern of unconstitutional employment discrimination.” 2265 Thus, accord- ing the Court, not only did the legislative history developed by the Congress not establish a pattern of unconstitutional discrimination
Image of page 421
Image of page 422
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern