Above Standard 8 Requires No Improvement Standard 7 pts Requires Improvement

Above standard 8 requires no improvement standard 7

This preview shows page 5 - 7 out of 7 pages.

Above Standard = 8Requires No ImprovementStandard = 7 ptsRequires ImprovementApproaching Standard = 6 ptsRequires RevisionFailing = 5 or lessRequires Significant RevisionSupporting DocumentationThe document shows significant support for the logic or argument with a variety of peer reviewed scholarly work with limited use of non scholarly work and is inclusiveof a broad and deep range of scholars, including critique and oppositionThe document often shows support for the logic or argument with a variety of peer reviewed scholarly work with some use of non scholarly work and is somewhat dependent on a limitedrange of scholars, including critique and oppositionThe document sometimes shows support for the logic or argument with a variety of peer reviewed scholarly work with some use of non scholarly work and is often dependent on a limited range of scholars, including critique and oppositionThe document rarely or never shows support for of logic or argument with a variety of peer reviewed scholarly work, and or is reliant on non scholarly work, or a limited range of scholars, includingcritique and oppositionAbove Standard = 7Requires No ImprovementStandard = 6 ptsRequires ImprovementApproaching Standard = 5 ptsRequires RevisionFailing = 4 or lessRequires Significant RevisionSourcesSources are scholarly, accurate, and relevantAll citations are listed in the reference section and all references are cited The reference section is accurateSources are often scholarly, accurate, and relevantAll citations are listed in the reference section and all references are citedThe references section is often accurateSources are sometimes scholarly, accurate, and relevant to use in the paperMost citations are listed in the reference section and most references are citedthe reference section is sometimes inaccurateSources, when used, are rarely or never scholarly, accurate, and relevantFew citations are referenced, several references are not citedThe reference section is inaccurate6/7/2020 – Management Program Writing Rubrics
Background image
Above Standard = 5Requires No ImprovementStandard = 4 ptsRequires ImprovementApproaching Standard = 3 ptsRequires RevisionFailing = 2 or lessRequires Significant RevisionQuotation, Summary, & ParaphraseProper use and relevance of quotation, summarization, and paraphrasing throughoutProper use of quotation, summarization, and paraphrasing is often used throughoutProper use of quotation, summarization, and paraphrasing is generally used throughoutProper use of quotation, summarization, and paraphrasing is rarely or never used throughoutRCSD Points:Comments or Notes:Critical Thinking, Logic, and Reasoning - Total Possible Points This Section _40_Above Standard = 8Requires No ImprovementStandard = 6.75 ptsRequires ImprovementApproaching Standard = 6 ptsRequires RevisionFailing = 5.5 or lessRequires Significant RevisionThesis Statement & Research Question(s)Thesis statement or research question(s) is unbiased, focused andclearly stated without overstatement or hyperbole.
Background image
Image of page 7

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read all 7 pages?

  • Summer '20
  • Logic, Academia, Illuminated manuscript

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture