80%(5)4 out of 5 people found this document helpful
This preview shows page 81 - 83 out of 85 pages.
the Netherlands' highest court said the virtual objects had an intrinsic value to the 13-year-old gamer because of "the time and energy he invested" in winning them while playing the gamehad perceived value and were under the exclusive control of a playerWoW Gold farmingSued AAMI after they refused to pay out for her 75 bars of real gold buillion she bought with profit from WoWPlanet Calypso: $US 6 MiloWhat is property? in relation to a textbookOwnership of the chose in possession based in possessionCopyrightThe words themselvesThe cover imageoBikram Choudhury case 1sttime a court definitely stated that the actual practice of Bikram yoga cannot be protected by copyright lawJudge Otis D. Wright, II, based his judgement on the copyright office's revisedposition this June stating that as a functional system (which promotes physicaland mental benefits) yoga postures cannot be registered for copyrightoBatista caseLong Island doctor Richard Batista to estranged wife: Give me my kidney back or $1.5MoIran kidney tradeMay 2015, the health minister put the price tag at 15 million toman ($4,400 at open market rates). In the interview, Arman asked patients not to go to the unofficial market, where prices are higheroBazley v Wesley Monash IVF Pty Ltd QSCCourt was faced with a long line of authority that holds that there is no ‘property’ in a human body or a corpse, however, it held that the semen was property and that it was being held under a bailment. The wife was entitled to its ownership after her husband died. oUniversity degreesTypically, the couple will have accumulated few tangible assets because they funnelled all their resources into one spouse's education with the mutual expectation of future rewards. Consequently, the dissolution of the marriage leaves the parties in a situation in which the "tablecloths will not cover both tables”oBlackstone’s commentaries“Property is that sole and despotic dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in total exclusion of the right ofany other individual in the universe”oKevin and Susan Gray“The term ‘property’ is simply an abbreviated reference to a quantum of socially permissible power exercised in respect of a socially valued resource”oKevin Gray“But the ultimate fact about property is that it does not really exist: it is mere illusion. It is a vacant concept – oddly enough rather like thin air.”
“property’..[is] a legally endorsed concentration of power over things and resources: Yanner v Eaton  HCA 53“Frequently the lay person (and even the lawyer) falls into the trap of supposing the term ‘property’ to connote the thing which is the object of ‘ownership’. But the beginning of truth about property is the realisation that property is not a thing but rather a relationship which one has with a thing. It isinfinitely more accurate, therefore, to say that one has property in a thing thanto declare that the thing is one’s property”