Existenial humanism o theres no law maker other than

This preview shows page 23 - 25 out of 31 pages.

- Existenial humanism  o There's no law maker other than himself and that in his forlornness he will decide by himself; because we point out that man will fulfill himself as man, not in turning toward himself but in seeking outside of himself a goal which is just this liveration. o Involves the awareness that the worl we live is in a HUMAn world. Our values and goals are set by us - I agree that we should not take pride in things we never ourselves did. There is an appreciation for them but pride comes when personal achievements occur. #24 Give a brief account of the egoistic hedonism that Epicurus thinks that we should use to govern our lives and explain what, if any, criticisms Sartre would have of Epicurus’ view. Which philosopher do you think has a more accurate conception of the point of human life?
- Epicurus’ thinks that we should always pursue pleasure. This type of hedonism, psychological and a normative doctrine - Psychoglgical in the sense that pleasure is what we always ultimately pursue – we our life decisions are closely analyse - And then we pursue pleasure in moderation - Sartre would argue that this type of doctrine stems from human nature perspective because Epicurus argues that we already choose to live a life accodrding to pleasure in general. Ie. you base the meaning of you life on emotions thorugh achievements . This to Sartre is incorrect because it is absurd that human nature should be viewed at all by accomplishments and pride. - Hewoul then think Epicurus is wrong to set a guide of how to live one’s life by toalways pursue pleasure. He would state that we choose who we want to be. Our actions are guided by what we think we are. There are not set principles to go by. We are who we are and our life is define dby our actions and the responsibilities that come with those actions. - I do think Epicurus makes critical point about living our life to maximize and secure pleasure – and to moderate it. That hardship in order to attain pleasure is necessary. Perhaps not the egoistic part where the ultimate goal is to please oneself evnen if it means to pelase others. I think that generosity is necessary, to give without necessarily being compensated – in moderation. - Everything in moderation - So int that sense, I think Sartre has a more accurate conception of the point of life because he negates pride as an acceptable behaviour. Knowing that all we do and what make of ourselves is purely done by us, it brings a sense of humility in that hard work brings you pleasantful things in life and - But I do not agree with epicurus conception on egoistism because I find Sartre’s view on Forlorness outweighs  I feel that it is right to feel a heavier weight on the fact that It is not just us we have ot work ahd for but for the better of others too. Whether it's on a small communal scale or a larger nation-wide, international scale.

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture