with current standards of practice applicable to the results from the case study.Post contributes unique perspectives or insights, but may be lacking some applicability to the case presentation. Post has limited perspectives orinsights and limited application to case presentation.Post perspectives are not consistent with current practice.33 Points23 Points13 Points0 PointsSupport from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)Discussion posts are supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided.Discussion posts partially supported by evidence from appropriate sources publishedwithin the last 5 years.In-text citations and full references are provided.Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited but may not fully support the discussion.Discussion posts partially supported by evidence.Sources may not be scholarly in nature or may be older than 5years.In-text citations and/orfull references may be incomplete or missing.Citations to non-scholarly websites given as rationale to support differential diagnoses and/or treatment plan.No evidence-based, peer reviewed journal articlecited.33 Points23 Points13 Points0 PointsOrganizationPost presents case study findings in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence; clearly relevant to topic.Post presents casestudy findings and plan or intervention that is sometimes unclear to follow, though relevant to topic.Post presents case findings and plan or intervention that are sometimes unclear to follow and may not always be relevant to topic.Post is not relevant to discussion question.33 Points23 Points13 Points0 PointsInteractive DialoguePresents findings and responds substantivelyto at least one topic-related post of a student peer and respond to all faculty questions posted by Friday.A substantive post Presents findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a student peer. Responds to some faculty questions posted Responds to a student peer and/or faculty, but the nature of the responseis not substantive.Does not respond to a topic-related peer post. Does not respond to faculty questions posted by
adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.by Friday. Friday.3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points Grammar, Syntax, APAPoints deducted for improper grammar,syntax and APA style of writingAPA format, grammar,spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to three errors.Four to six errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation notedSeven to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation arenotedPost contains greater than nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
- Fall '15
- Nursing, United States bankruptcy law, Bankruptcy in the United States, Physical examination, M. H.