McNamara D S Graesser A C Louwerse M M in press Sources of text difficulty

Mcnamara d s graesser a c louwerse m m in press

This preview shows page 36 - 38 out of 43 pages.

McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., & Louwerse, M. M. (in press). Sources of text difficulty: Across the ages and genres. In J. P. Sabatini & E. Albro (Eds.), Assessing reading in the 21stcentury: Aligning and applying advances in the reading and measurement sciences. Lanham, MD: R&L Education.Mesmer, H. A. E. (2008). Tools for matching readers to texts: Research-based practices.New York, NY: Guilford.
Background image
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS for ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS & LITERACY IN HISTORY/SOCIAL STUDIES, SCIENCE, AND TECHNICAL SUBJECTSAPPENDIX A | 37Milewski, G. B., Johnson, D., Glazer, N., & Kubota, M. (2005). A survey to evaluate the alignment of the new SAT Writing and Critical Reading sections to curricula and instructional practices(College Board Research Report No. 2005-1 / ETS RR-05-07). New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.Moss, B., & Newton, E. (2002). An examination of the informational text genre in basal readers. Reading Psychology, 23(1), 1–13.National Endowment for the Arts. (2004). Reading at risk: A survey of literary reading in America.Washington, DC: Author.Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook(pp. 227–247). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Pritchard, M. E., Wilson, G. S., & Yamnitz, B. (2007). What predicts adjustment among college students? A longitudinal panel study. Journal of American College Health, 56(1), 15–22.Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59.Stenner, A. J., Koons, H., & Swartz, C. W. (in press). Text complexity and developing expertise in reading.Chapel Hill, NC: MetaMetrics, Inc.van den Broek, P., Lorch, Jr., R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory and Cognition, 29, 1081–1087.van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers’ standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading(pp. 353–373). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Williamson, G. L. (2006). Aligning the journey with a destination: A model for K–16 reading standards.Durham, NC: MetaMetrics, Inc.Wirt, J., Choy, S., Rooney, P., Provasnik, S., Sen, A., & Tobin, R. (2004). The condition of education 2004 (NCES 2004-077). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Print-ing Office. Retrieved from Yopp, H. K., & Yopp, R. H. (2006). Primary students and informational texts. Science and Children, 44(3), 22–25.Reading Foundational SkillsBalmuth, M. (1992). The roots of phonics: A historical introduction. Baltimore, MD: York Press.Bryson, B. (1990). The mother tongue: English and how it got that way. New York, NY: Avon Books.Ganske, K. (2000). Word journeys. New York, NY: Guilford.Hanna, P. R., Hanna, S., Hodges, R. E., & Rudorf, E. H. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Background image
Image of page 38

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read all 43 pages?

  • Fall '12
  • Trousdale
  • Qualitative Research, Educational years, Technical Subjects, Text Complexity

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture