backed currency remained in circulation occupied the efforts of
inflationists
. Governments at this
point could use currency as an instrument of policy, printing paper currency such as the United
States
Greenback
, to pay for military expenditures. They could also set the terms at which they
would redeem notes for specie, by limiting the amount of purchase, or the minimum amount that
could be redeemed.
Banknotes with a face value of 5000 of different currencies
By 1900, most of the industrializing nations were on some form of gold standard, with paper
notes and silver coins constituting the circulating medium. Private
banks
and governments across
the world followed
Gresham's Law
: keeping gold and silver paid, but paying out in notes. This
did not happen all around the world at the same time, but occurred sporadically, generally in
times of war or financial crisis, beginning in the early part of the 20th century and continuing
across the world until the late 20th century, when the regime of floating fiat currencies came into
force. One of the last countries to break away from the
gold standard
was the United States in
1971.
No country anywhere in the world today has an enforceable
gold standard
or
silver standard
currency system.

Traditional View point of Money:
classical economists did not attach much significance to
money as an independent variable capable of disturbing the functioning of the entire economy. For them
money was simply a device or a mere convenience merely as the means of acquiring the goods & service
which are the real object of there desire. In there view the total amount of employment, the volume of
production, the types
proportion of the various goods &services product and consumed, the exchange
values of the various goods and service in the market and distribution of real wealth and income among
the member
of the community are normally the same in a money economy as the would be in a highly
developed and efficient barter economy.
According to Adam smith “ Highway which while it circulates and carries to market all the grass and corn
of the country, produce itself not a single pile of either”
According to John Stuart Mill “ It must be evident , hoverer, that the mere introduction of particular
mode of exchanging things for one another by first ,
exchanging
a things for money and the exchanging
the money for something else, makes no difference in the essential character of transactions”
Why did classical economists consider money as an insignificant factor in the functioning of an
economy? The answer is that they tacitly assumed the stability of the value of the money. Their main
interest lied in the long run. Guided by say s Law of market they believed that the supply of money
would adjust itself to the demand for money in the long run. Although Mill had conceded that money‘‘
exerts a distinct and independent influence of its own rare. They assumed the existence of `equilibrium
conditions` where are factor , output, cost and prices become so adjusted that there would no incentive
for further change.

You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 6 pages?
- Winter '18
- Md. Hashibul Hassan
- fiat