33Elliott Currie,The Roots of Danger: Violent Crime in Global Perspective(1st edn, Pearson 2008).34W.S. DeKeseredy and P. Olsson, 'Adult Pornography, Male Peer Support, And Violence Against Women: TheContribution ofthe “Dark Side” Of the Internet',Technology for facilitating humanity and combating social deviations:Interdisciplinary perspectives(Jensen 2007).35Naomi Klein,The Shock Doctrine(Penguin 2008).36Lorne Tepperman,Deviance, Crime and Control(2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2010).37Ian Taylor,Crime in Context: A Critical Criminology of Market Societies(Polity 1999).
Corpus JurisISSN: 2582-2918The Law Journalwebsite: CORPUS JURIS|10crime’; the nature of criminal victimization; and the concurrent restructuring ofcrime control practices38which are only recently being taken up. CriticalCriminology entered the new age with its old canons intact, and these old tenetsof Critical Criminology in a new century39may not be able to deal with thefundamental ‘dislocations of justice’ that take place in every part of our socialorder, at a global scale.Critical Criminology continues to unduly focus on “the crime problem”, andthe over-all procedures and practices of penalty and criminalisation, therebymaking Critical Criminology ill-prepared to reply to the present-daydevelopments.Crime cannot be understood as being the preserve of regionalgovernments or one particular nation-state. Activities that occur in one cornerof the world can directly impact the other parts.The emergence of punitive penalty, issues involving and impacting variousminority groups and women, the resurrection of private policing, evidence ofmany targeted tough law and order mechanisms, active citizenship, etc40are afew recent examples of the emergence of new situations posing challenge toCritical Criminology and have compelled scholars to put forth concernsregarding the need to embrace such global developments.Critical Criminology seems to follow a very authoritarian-state-centred analysiswhich limits the scope of rigorous investigations into understanding thecontradictions related to the due processes and the inherent biases of liberaldemocratic governance. The governmental landscape is vigorously changingand Critical Criminology’s incapability to sociologically understand variousuncertainties and dangers that define this change complicate the issue.Critical Criminology may be a unity that is constantly shaped and reshaped by arange of strategies that are spread across the empirical, epistemological and38Robert Reiner,An Honest Citizen's Guide to Crime and Control(Polity Press 2007).39Jack Young, 'Critical Criminology in The Twenty-First Century: Critique, Irony and The Always Unfinished',CriticalCriminology: Issues, Debates, Challenges(Willan 2002).
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document
End of preview. Want to read all 22 pages?
Upload your study docs or become a
Course Hero member to access this document