ET05.pdf

# For each of the materials the liftoff curves

• No School
• AA 1
• 43

This preview shows page 10 - 12 out of 43 pages.

material at 10 kHz. For each of the materials, the liftoff curves resulting from depth changes in flat bottom holes were obtained and compared. The excitation levels were assumed to be small, so nonlinearities and hysteresis effects could be neglected. Liftoff Parameter Figures 5 and 6 summarize the results for various probes with respect to liftoff. The impedance change rate is plotted for the absolute probes and the rate of change of induced voltage is plotted for the double-coil probe in Fig. 5; Z 0 and V 0 represent the probe impedance and induced voltage at zero liftoff. Figure 5a shows the rates of change of impedance and induced voltage caused by liftoff in the nonmagnetic material. The curve for the double-coil probe indicates that it provides a greater output voltage over a greater liftoff range than any of the absolute probes. Figure 5b shows similar calculations for carbon steel test objects. The change in the induced voltage in the double probe also occurs over a wider range of liftoff values than for the absolute probes. To clarify the differences in range and linearity of liftoff calculations between the various probes, the normalized curves shown in Fig. 6 are useful. The change in impedance defined as Z = Z Z 0 is normalized with respect to Z max , defined as Z max = Z Z 0 , where Z is the coil impedance at infinite liftoff. Similarly, the change in induced voltage is normalized with respect to V max . The normalized rates of change are defined as Z · Z –1 max and V · V –1 max . The double coil exhibits a more useful range for liftoff measurement 136 Electromagnetic Testing F IGURE 3. Surface probe over conducting surface: (a) small diameter single-coil probe; (b) large diameter single-coil probe; (c) double-coil probe. (a) (b) (c) F IGURE 4. Surface probes in presence of flat bottom holes: (a) small diameter single-coil probe; (b) large diameter single-coil probe; (c) double-coil probe. (a) (b) (c)

Subscribe to view the full document.

and better linearity than the absolute probe exhibits. Range and linearity are shown for nonmagnetic material in Fig. 6a and for magnetic material in Fig. 6b. Hole Depth Parameter To simulate a test for evaluating the depth of discontinuities in metal, flat bottom holes of various diameters were used with the probes described above. The probe was located over the hole, flush with the metal surface and centered with the hole. The hole depth was then changed and the signal from the probe was plotted. Figure 7 shows the rate of change of impedance or induced voltage corresponding to the change in depth of a 10 mm (0.4 in.) diameter hole. Similarly, Fig. 8 represents the normalized rates of change for the same test. Again, the sensitivity, useful range and linearity are better in the case of the double-coil probe. Noise Reduction Effects When eddy current probes are used for applications such as crack and corrosion detection, the noise caused by liftoff 137 Probes for Electromagnetic Testing F IGURE 5. Finite element prediction of change in impedance Z and induced voltage V due to liftoff changes:
• Fall '19
• Wind, The Land, Magnetic Field, Eddy Current Probes, electromagnetic testing

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern