For example in the scenario of baby m sandel explains

Info icon This preview shows pages 2–3. Sign up to view the full content.

freedom, welfare, and virtue – may vary from person to person even from libertarian to libertarian. For example, in the scenario of Baby M, Sandel explains how from a libertarian perspective Mary Beth Whitehead did not consensually sign the contract since she was ultimately coerced by need for money, furthermore the argument is made that full consent cannot be made until the baby is delivered since the bond is not yet wholly established. Therefore, from a libertarian standpoint it would be wrong to make Mary Beth give up the baby or make the decision to do so until after the baby is born. However, from a utilitarian standpoint – which ultimately values everything in the sense of added happiness – justice would be achieved by choosing the alternative that produced more happiness/utility. This might not necessarily be in favor of the biological mother as there are two individuals being affected by her actions. This is just one of the many conflicting perceptions of justice that distinguishes these two polar opposite methods of thinking. By tackling each issue from both of the respective standpoints the flow of the book as a whole remains smooth and easy to follow. This creates better comprehension for the reader and avoids getting tangled in confusing transitions which I believe is one of the book’s outstanding strengths However for the weakness, I believe that at times the rationale offered by the writer was too vague, or more specifically objections would be far too general. This would often times come off as obvious or not worthy of being noted however it only occurs a few times up to this point making it non-problematic. Conclusion: The argument of justice comes down to a number of different components and based on which you value the most your perception of justice is contingent upon that. Libertarians claim that justice is the right to individual freedom while utilitarian’s stick to their argument of common good for the majority whereas Aristotle claims it is giving each person what they deserve. Nonetheless, every one of these perceptions offers some form of interpreted justice, however the problem lies in the sense that in the same scenario where you perceive something to be just, another individual may perceive it in the opposite manner. Therefore, the question that remains: is there a truly universal form of Justice?
Image of page 2

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern