to be established the future of the Israeli settlements and settlers water

To be established the future of the israeli

This preview shows page 10 - 12 out of 12 pages.

to be established, the future of the Israeli settlements and settlers, water rights, the resolution of the refugee problem and the status of Jerusalem were set aside to be discussed in final status talks. The PLO accepted this deeply flawed agreement with Israel because it was weak and had little diplomatic sup- port in the Arab world. Both Islamist radicals and local leaders in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip challenged Arafat’s leadership. Yet only Arafat had the prestige and national legitimacy to conclude a negotiated agreement with Israel. The Oslo accords set up a negotiating process with- out specifying an outcome. The process was supposed to have been completed by May 1999. There were many delays due to Israel’s reluctance to relinquish control
Image of page 10
11 PALESTINE, ISRAEL AND THE ARAB-ISRAELI CONFLICT: A PRIMER over the occupied territories, unwillingness to make the kinds of concessions necessary to reach a final status agreement, and periodic outbursts of violence by Palestinian opponents of the Oslo process, espe- cially HAMAS and Jihad. During the Likud’s return to power in 1996-99, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu avoided engaging seriously in the Oslo process, which he distrusted and fundamentally opposed. A Labor-led coalition government led by Prime Minister Ehud Barak came to power in 1999. Barak at first concen- trated on reaching a peace agreement with Syria. When he failed to convince the Syrians to sign an agreement that would restore to them less than all the area of the Golan Heights occupied by Israel in 1967, Barak turned his at- tention to the Palestinian track. During the protracted interim period of the Oslo process, Israel’s Labor and Likud governments built new settlements in the occupied territories, expanded existing settlements and constructed a network of by- pass roads to enable Israeli settlers to travel from their settlements to Israel proper without passing through Palestinian-inhabited areas. These projects were un- derstood by most Palestinians as marking out territory that Israel sought to annex in the final settlement. The Oslo accords contained no mechanism to block these unilateral actions or Israel’s violations of Palestinian human and civil rights in areas under its control. Final status negotiations between Israel and the Pal- estinians were to have begun in mid-1996, but only got underway in earnest in mid-2000. By then, a series of painfully negotiated Israeli interim withdrawals left the Palestinian Authority with direct or partial control of some 40 percent of the West Bank and 65 percent of the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian areas were surrounded by Israeli-controlled territory with entry and exit con- trolled by Israel. The Palestinians’ expectations were not accommo- dated by the Oslo accords. The Oslo process required the Palestinians to make their principal compromises at the beginning, whereas Israel’s principal compromises beyond recognition of the PLO were to be made in the final status talks.
Image of page 11
Image of page 12

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read all 12 pages?

  • Fall '19

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern

Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask ( soon) You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes