Analysis of Netflixs Boston Consulting Group BCG Growth Share Matrix Netflixs

Analysis of netflixs boston consulting group bcg

  • Liberty University
  • BUSI 690
  • Essay
  • magpie2015
  • 16
  • 96% (69) 66 out of 69 people found this document helpful

This preview shows page 6 - 8 out of 16 pages.

Analysis of Netflix’s Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Growth-Share Matrix Netflix’s BCG growth-share matrix is based upon the firm’s 2013 annual report. The firm separates its segments into three categories: domestic streaming, international streaming, and domestic DVD (Netflix, 2013). Its domestic streaming segment is clearly the most profitable of the three categories. In the BCG matrix, it is identified as the “star.” In 2013, this segment experienced revenues totaling $2,751,375,000 and a contribution profit of $622,767,000 (Netflix, 2013). However, the firm’s international streaming segment was far less profitable that year. In this segment, revenues totaled $712,390,000 while the firm incurred a contribution loss of -$274,332,000 (Netflix, 2013). This disparity is due to the fact that the firm incurred a cost of revenue total of $774,753,000 (Netflix, 2013). This challenged segment would easily qualify as the “dog” in the BCG matrix. Netflix’s domestic DVD segment was not as problematic for the organization as its international streaming segment. This third and final segment experienced revenues of $910,797,000 and a contribution profit of $438,982,000 (Netflix, 2013).
The Product Life Cycle At this point in Netflix’s history, it is clear that their domestic streaming segment is in its maturity phase. Rothaermel writes (2013), “The winners in this increasingly competitive environment are generally firms that stake a strong position as cost leaders” (p. 178). During this phase, “product features and performance requirements are now well established” (Rothaermel, 2013, p. 179). Netflix’s domestic streaming segment certainly meets these criteria and it is evident that the firm’s leaders are striving to ensure that the organization remains a cost leader in the industry. However, it is apparent that the international streaming segment is struggling. Although some firms with segments that are struggling in a similar fashion find themselves in the decline stage and would consider the option of pursuing a harvest strategy, this is not true for Netflix or this particular segment. The company is clearly striving to gain and maintain a strong international presence. It is evident that Netflix’s managers view this segment as an area with potential for growth despite its present struggles. The domestic DVD segment, however, has been experiencing a decline as a result of the emergence of services such as Redbox. Less and less consumers are taking advantage of DVD-by-mail subscriptions. Competitors Netflix is not without its fair share of strong competitors. In analyzing the competition, it is important to first examine the impact that competitive forces have on the firm. Competitive Forces Analysis The five key competitive forces as outlined by Porter have significant consequences for Netflix. Rothaermel (2013) writes, “The weaker the five forces, the greater the industry’s profit potential – making the industry more attractive” (p. 65). Although Netflix currently possesses a competitive advantage and is on track to continue experiencing success in the short-term, an

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture