They tried to force new laws on the colonists in that

This preview shows page 2 - 3 out of 7 pages.

they tried to "force" new laws on the colonists. In that perspective, they should have tried to understand from the colonists point of view and what was happening overseas. The should have settled it like adults by discussing what's best to do or not, instead of just emphasizing things without thinking twice. Thinking about what best for their child doesn't make someone a bad parent, but they should listen and try to understand why their children are acting bad. But, I don't think anything could have been prevented. You can always try to stop someone from doing something, but if it's sent in their mind then it's hard to get them to listen. 4. Andrew Jackson Discussion: Andrew Jackson was one of the most influential presidents in U.S History. He fashioned himself as the champion of the "common man" and brought a distinctive leadership style that left lasting impacts. What were some of the key focuses of the Jackson administration? Give at least two examples and then take a position on how they were either positive or negative for the nation. a. There was a lot of key focuses of the Jackson administration. One of them was the Indian Removal Act. This act was signed and finalized by president Jackson in 1830. It was a congressional act that authorized the removal of Native Americans who lived east of the Mississippi River. Many indian tribes moved peacefully, but many also resisted the relocation policy. This led to the Trail of Tears: which was a forced journey of the Cherokee Indians from Georgia to a region west of the Mississippi. Although the Trail of Tears was a terrible incident that happened because of the Indian Removal Act, this act was passed on the intent that land and good (merchandise) could be traded for the current land on which the Indians were settled upon. Unfortunately Andrew Jackson did not do that and forced the Indians of their property. But there were a lot of pros and cons to this act. Overall, I do not think that was positive or negative for the nation. Based on my research The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was not justified because both sides (Native Americans and White Americans) were at a lost and gained little to nothing at the end. Another one of his key focuses the Spoils Systems. The system that was advocated by Andrew Jackson was based on rotation in office and rewarding loyal supporters. Jackson had good cause in placing so much importance on loyalty.The Spoils System has been around forever. The system of and by itself, is not "bad." Only when someone is appointed to a position that they have no experience with, or if they are appointed simply because they know the president, or whoever is doing the appointing, then the system is bad. If a President could not appoint people around him who had the same goals and desires for the nation, nothing would get accomplished. This I would say is negative for the nation.
5. Mexican-American War/Manifest Destin y Discussion: The validity of the Mexican-American War and Manifest Destiny itself have been debated by historians and politicians. Can one country or the other be held responsible for causing the war or was it an inevitable clash of the 19th century forces, values, nationalistic attitudes and cultural differences? Also, in your opinion, was the decision for the U.S. to declare war on Mexico the right one? Consider the value of

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture