Discretion to policemen and it criminalized

Info icon This preview shows pages 199–201. Sign up to view the full content.

discretion to policemen, and it criminalized activities that by mod- ern standards are normally innocent. 1095 1091 Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U.S. 451 (1939); Edelman v. California, 344 U.S. 357 (1953). 1092 Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, 405 U.S. 156 (1972); Smith v. Goguen, 415 U.S. 566 (1974). Generally, a vague statute that regulates in the area of First Amendment guarantees will be pronounced wholly void. Winters v. New York, 333 U.S. 507, 509–10 (1948); Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 (1940). 1093 405 U.S. 156 (1972). 1094 405 U.S. at 156 n.1. Similar concerns regarding vagrancy laws had been expressed previously. See , e.g. , Winters v. New York, 333 U.S. 507, 540 (1948) (Jus- tice Frankfurter dissenting); Edelman v. California, 344 U.S. 357, 362 (1953) (Jus- tice Black dissenting); Hicks v. District of Columbia, 383 U.S. 252 (1966) (Justice Douglas dissenting). 1095 Similarly, an ordinance making it a criminal offense for three or more per- sons to assemble on a sidewalk and conduct themselves in a manner annoying to passers-by was found impermissibly vague and void on its face because it en- croached on the freedom of assembly. Coates v. City of Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611 (1971). See Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 382 U.S. 87 (1965) (conviction under stat- 2031 AMENDMENT 14—RIGHTS GUARANTEED
Image of page 199

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

In FCC v. Fox , 567 U.S. ___, No. 10–1293, slip op. (2012) the Court held that the Federal Communiations Commission (FCC) had violated the Fifth Amendment due process rights of Fox Television and ABC, Inc., because the FCC had not given fair notice that broad- casting isolated instances of expletives or brief nudity could lead to punishment. 18 U.S.C. § 1464 bans the broadcast of “any obscene, indecent, or profane language”, but the FCC had a long-standing policy that it would not consider “fleeting” instances of indecency to be actionable, and had confirmed such a policy by issuance of an industry guidance. The policy was not announced until after the in- stances at issues in this case (two concerned isolated utterances of expletives during two live broadcasts aired by Fox Television, and a brief exposure of the nude buttocks of an adult female character by ABC). The Commission policy in place at the time of the broad- casts, therefore, gave the broadcasters no notice that a fleeting in- stance of indecency could be actionable as indecent. On the other hand, some less vague statutes may be held un- constitutional only in application to the defendant before the Court. 1096 For instance, where the terms of a statute could be applied both to innocent or protected conduct (such as free speech) and unpro- tected conduct, but the valuable effects of the law outweigh its po- tential general harm, such a statute will be held unconstitutional only as applied. 1097 Thus, in Palmer v. City of Euclid , 1098 an ordi- nance punishing “suspicious persons” defined as “[a]ny person who wanders about the streets or other public ways or who is found abroad at late or unusual hours in the night without any visible or lawful business and who does not give satisfactory account of himself” was found void only as applied to a particular defendant. In Palmer , the
Image of page 200
Image of page 201
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern