Of a dialogic argument 2 between two arguers this

Info icon This preview shows pages 4–6. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
of a dialogic argument 2 between two arguers. This allows that any argument 2 will (possibly) contain arguments 1 from various modes, and an argument 2 may be analyzed as containing 3 I take the liberty of introducing a new term here in order to afford sufficient breadth without at the same time using terminology generally in disrepute. I.e., the kisceral covers not only the intuitive but also , for those who indulge, the mystical, religious, supernatural and extra- sensory. 'Kisceral' is chosen in order to have a descriptive term that does not carry with it normative baggage, like, for example, fmysticalg or fextra-sensoryg.
Image of page 4

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
M . A . GILBERT MULTI - MODAL ARGUMENTATION PHIL OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES V OL 24 N R 2 .5 various degrees of several or all four modes. Further, I will argue that to attempt to re-interpret all these to the logical is prejudiced reductionism. Before continuing it is important to clarify two basic terms. The first is fargumentg, the second fmodeg For fargumentg I will use Willard's definition, most recently restated in A Theory of Argumentation , (p. 1, 1989): " Argument is a form of interaction in which two or more people maintain what they construe to be incompatible positions." Essentially, argument is communi- cation when there is real or imagined disagreement. Explicating this, Willard says (p. 92) that arguers, "use any or all of the communication vehicles available to them ... Once we have an argument anything used to communicate within it is germane to an analysis of how the argument proceeds and how it affects the arguers." In short, we have to worry less about the necessary and sufficient conditions of argument and more about what people who are arguing actually do. In using Willard's definition I am intentionally beginning from a very broad platform and focusing on what should be done to understand and analyze argument taken in its broadest sense. There are, of course, alternative definitions. Copigs definition is a classical understanding of an argument as a Claim-Reason Complex (CRC): \An argument , in this sense is any group of propositions of which one is claimed to follow from the others, which are regarded as providing evidence for the truth of that one] (p. 7, 1961). The difference between Copigs definition and Willardgs, is that while Copi certainly lays out what is an fargumentg, it has no real relevance to farguingg. That is, while it provides us with a basis for studying certain static characteristics inherent in one slice of propositional entities, it has little or nothing to do with what happens when peoplegs beliefs and/or attitudes come into conflict. And, it is this latter area that concerns contemporary argumentation theory. It is the very breadth of Willardgs definition that permits and encourages the exploration of the dynamics of argument.
Image of page 5
Image of page 6
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern