The minor penalties associated with misdemeanour

Info icon This preview shows pages 4–5. Sign up to view the full content.

The minor penalties associated with misdemeanour convictions are not a sufficient deterrent” [Premise] The sentence was justified [Conclusion] Audience: Society generally. Opponents: Those who place other values (like entertainment) above the suffering of animals. e) They were not sufficient, she claimed, because “dog fighting yields such large profits for participants [that dog fighters] merely absorb these fines as part of the cost of doing business.” Argument: Dog fighting yields such large profits for participants [that dog fighters] merely absorb these fines as part of the cost of doing business. [Premise] Minor penalties are not sufficient [Conclusion] Audience: Society and those who might perpetuate such crimes in the future. Opponents: Those who place other values (like entertainment) above the suffering of animals. 2. A discussion of the dog-trainer’s case above might easily evolve in a way that considers many related issues. Given that it is wrong to be cruel to animals, why is it permissible to kill them and eat them? Isn’t killing animals a form of cruelty? Identify the position you would propound on the question whether it is permissible to eat animals. Construct a short argument responding to the views of your opponents in this context. In the argument suggested, the premise is “killing something is a form of cruelty,” and the conclusion is “it is wrong to kill and eat animals.”
Image of page 4

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

Good Reasoning Matters! A Constructive Approach to Critical Thinking, Fifth Edition © Oxford University Press Canada, 2012 The following argument might be used to address this: Premise: Killing that is painless and free of suffering is not cruel. Premise : Animals that are killed for food under government regulations are killed without pain or suffering. Conclusion : Animals that are killed for food are not treated cruelly. Major Exercise 1M 1. What is the argument in the following advertisement from Family , which features a large photo of a baby, accompanied by text? Who is the intended audience? How can you tell? Y OU RE THE ONE WHO HAS PROMISED TO PROTECT HER . P ROTECT HER SCALP FROM IRRITATION WITH NEW IMPROVED J OHNSON S B ABY S HAMPOO , THE ONLY ONE CLINICALLY PROVEN HYPOALLERGENIC . Argument: You have promised to protect her. So, you should protect her scalp. To do that you need new improved Johnson’s baby shampoo. So you should buy Johnson’s baby shampoo. Audience: The intended audience is mothers of newborns. Such an audience would be most susceptible to the emotional appeal conveyed by the words and the image.
Image of page 5
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
  • Summer '12
  • CARAZZA
  • University Press Canada, Good Reasoning Matters

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern