social services, indicating that social services were used across all levelsof educational attainment.Linked to the above, a difference was identified between perceptionsof social services by readers of different newspapers. The most positiveopinion was identified with readers ofThe Guardian,The IndependentandFinancial Timeswith more than 60 per cent of readers reportinggenerally positive impression of social services (seeFigure 4). This com-pares to readers of theDaily ExpressandDaily Mail, of which less than50 per cent (37 and 45 per cent, respectively) reported a good impres-sion of social services.The findings also identified a statistically significant correlation be-tweenthegenderoftherespondentandreportedopinionsoftheScottish Government’s role in improving the care for people’s lives.Overall, a higher percentage of men disagree and strongly disagree thatsocial services improve the care of people’s lives. However, analysis ofbasic respondent characteristics did not turn up broad or consistent pat-terns ‘across’ the survey findings. For example, neither education norhow well-off a household is appear to matter much. This underscoresthe importance of looking at intersectional influences, when it comes toperceptions of social services, as opposed to simple, one-dimensionalcharacteristics.Finally, and importantly, a statistically significant correlation was iden-tified between the participant’s opinion of the provision in their own lo-cal area and their perception of the overall provision in Scotland. Thisseems to indicate that people’s opinion of the broader provision inScotland is formed from their opinion of specific provision in their localFigure 4:General impression of social services in Scotland of different newspaper readers(n¼2,505)1158Trish McCulloch and Stephen WebbDownloaded from by 81695661,OUP on 04 July 2020