Method all in all it was noticed that the analytical

This preview shows page 7 - 9 out of 9 pages.

method. All in all, it was noticed that the analytical method was the best method to limit the sources of error when calculating a resultant through vector addition. The experimental method caused the most source of error through both human and systematic errors through inaccurate measurements on the Force Table, as well as things that were ignored or uncontrollable. c) Sources of Error The major source of errors most likely came from measuring and reading the length of the vectors and angles incorrectly. This issue was most likely prevalent through the experimental and graphical methods. It was possible for our data for the experimental section of vector addition I to have skewed results, due to the fact that our Force Table was not leveled. This is considered a systematic error since we ignored checking the level of the surface before we proceeded with the first section of the experiment. It was also possible that each member may have failed to properly reach the force table as well as balance weights. Human error, or random errors in relation to measurement, could have caused inaccurate data throughout the experiment. Errors could have occurred if the protractor was not properly lined up at exactly zero, which could have led to more possible calculation errors throughout the process of finding the resultant. d) Reflection Within this experiment, the addition of vectors graphically, analytically, and experimentally was utilized to find a resultant. Through practicing with vector addition with the use of these three methods, we could determine the difference in utilizing each of these methods.
Through calculating the resultant in each of these cases, we were could conclude which methods were the most accurate and which has the most drawbacks.

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture