may use the nation as a pedagogical site and a critically engaged political project. I begin by introducing the pedagogical interests of academic history that advance narratives of nation to form the basis of education in the United States (as with other nations). The process of defining nation through various myths is projected onto education in characteristic ways, by Finn and others, which orchestrates a nation's self-construction. Yet, in realizing their own implication in advancing such myths, academic historians are becoming increasingly mindful of how to relate national experiences to larger projects and local resolutions. Important political issues are at stakewhen considering social studies as a subject integral in its function to define a nation's history, which various social studies educators have addressed previously. Still, social studies educators need to remain vigilant in initiating questions about howits discipline realizes the authority to affirm particular conceptions of nation through history.In attempting to place the nation within a more global context, educators frequently employ global educational ideology that is often used as a basis from which to engage in comparative studies between nations. We need to move beyond the "feel good" global educational ideology to question how nation remains central tosocial studies education.BALL Karl Mannheim Professor of Sociology of Education 2000Stephen J.-(white male)elected Fellow of The British Academy in 2006, @ Kings College of London for 15 years at time of the publication, MBA and PhD @ the University of Sussex; Performativities and Fabrications In the Education Economy: Towards the Performative Society?; AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER Vol 27, No. 2; August; %20debate/Downloads/S%20ball%20perfmority%20fabrications%20in%20the%20education%20economy%20towards%20the%20performative%20society-%20(1).pdfLet me begin by offering a working definition of performativity. Performativity isa technology, a culture and a mode of regulation, or a system of 'terror' in Lyotard's words, that employs judgements, comparisons and displays as means of control, attrition and change.The performances (of individual subjects or organisations) serve as measures of productivity or output, or displays of 'quality', or 'moments' of promotion (there is a felicititous ambiguity around this word) or inspection. They stand for, encapsulate or represent the worth, quality or value of an individual or organisation within a fieldof judgement. 'An equation between wealth, efficiency, and truth is thus established' (Lyotard 1984, p. 46). The issue of who controls the field of judgement is crucial. 'Accountability' and 'competition' are the lingua franca of this new discourse of poweras Lyotard describes it. A discourse which is the emerging form of legitimationin post-industrial societies for both the production of knowledge and its transmission througheducation.
You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 142 pages?
- Winter '18
- Mack Morehead