{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

G fraternity sorority pledges go thru this to shape

Info iconThis preview shows pages 5–8. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
e.g. fraternity, sorority “pledges” go thru this to shape them into proper role ** bold → more management relies on these kinds of programs (better) Effects of Layoffs - can mean that ppl who know the culture best leave the org. - fear & stress about layoffs can seriously erode company’s culture Matching People With Cultures - (Goffee & Jones) 2 dimensions that underlie org. culture: Sociability : measure of friendliness (high ppl orientation, high team orientation, focus on processes) high sociability: ppl do kind things for one another w/o expecting sth in return; relate to each other in friendly, caring way Solidarity : strength of group’s task orientation (high attention to detail, high aggressiveness) high solidarity: ppl can overlook personal biases and rally behind common interests & common goals Four-Culture Typology Sociability H IGH Networked Communal L OW Fragmented Mercenary L OW H IGH Solidarity
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
P ART 4: S HARING THE O RGANIZATIONAL V ISION Sociability Solidarity D OWNSIDE Networked culture HIGH LOW - org view members as family & friends - ppl know & like each other, willingly help others, openly share info - strong sense of belonging - passionate identification w/ company product e.g. some family businesses focus on friendships can lead to tolerance for poor performance & creation of political cliques Mercenary culture LOW HIGH - fiercely goal-focused - ppl are intense & determined to meet goals - ppl have enthusiasm for getting things done quickly & powerful sense of purpose - not just abt winning; also abt destroying enemy - objectivity leads to minimal degree of politicking - may have lil tolerance for socializing / small talk can lead to almost inhumane treatment of ppl who are perceived as low performers Fragmented culture LOW LOW - made up of individualists - commitment is 1 st & foremost to members & their job tasks - lil / no identification w/ organization - employees judged solely on their productivity & quality of work e.g. some large accounting, law firms; uni’s (profs are judged on research & scholarship, don’t need to be friendly to retain status) can lead to excessive critiquing of others & absence of collegiality and cooperation Communal culture HIGH HIGH - value friendship & performance - ppl have feeling of belonging, but there’s still ruthless focus on goal achievement - leaders tend to be inspirational & charismatic w/ clear vision of org’s future often consumes employee’s life (charismatic leaders often expect to create disciples rather than followers → “cult-like” work climate THE LIABILITIES OF CULTURE - reduces ambiguity Culture as a Barrier to Change - employees less likely to have shared values when org’s environment is dynamic - consistency (even tho an asset when facing stable environment) may burden org & make responding to changes in environment difficult - strong cultures: practices that led to previous successes can lead to failure (practices need to match up well w/ environmental needs)
Background image of page 6
P ART 4: S HARING THE O RGANIZATIONAL V ISION Culture as a Barrier to Diversity - management wants new employees (race, gender, disability diff’s) to accept org’s core culture values, while openly acknowledge, demonstrate support for diff’s these employees bring to workplace (paradox) -
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 8
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}