{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

A a greater percentage of swiss industrial workers

Info iconThis preview shows pages 3–6. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
A. A greater percentage of Swiss industrial workers than American industrial workers lived in urban areas. B. There were more cities of 10,000 or more inhabitants in Switzerland than there were in the United States. 17
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
C. Swiss workers living in urban areas were more likely to be employed in industry than were American workers living in urban areas. D. Urbanized areas of Switzerland were more likely than similar areas in the United States to have strong leftist parties. E. A greater percentage of the United States population than the Swiss population lived in urban areas. Answer: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Q8: From 1980 to 1989, total consumption of fish in the country of Jurania increased by 4.5 percent, and total consumption of poultry products there increased by 9.0 percent. During the same period, the population of Jurania increased by 6 percent, in part due to immigration to Jurania from other countries in the region. If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true on the basis of them? A. During the 1980’s in Jurania, profits of wholesale distributors of poultry products increased at a greater rate than did profits of wholesale distributors of fish. B. For people who immigrated to Jurania during the 1980’s, fish was less likely to be a major part of their diet than was poultry. C. In 1989 Juranians consumed twice as much poultry as fish. D. For a significant proportion of Jurania’s population, both fish and poultry products were a regular part of their diet during the 1980’s. E. Per capita consumption of fish in Jurania was lower in 1989 than in 1980. Answer: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Q9 to Q12: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock , the United States Supreme Court rejected the Line efforts of three Native American tribes (5) to prevent the opening of tribal lands to non-Indian settlement without tribal consent. In his study of the Lone Wolf case, Blue Clark properly emphasizes the Court’s assertion (10) of a virtually unlimited unilateral power of Congress (the House of Represen- tatives and the Senate) over Native American affairs. But he fails to note the decision’s more far-reaching (15) impact: shortly after Lone Wolf , the federal government totally abandoned 18
Background image of page 4
negotiation and execution of formal written agreements with Indian tribes as a prerequisite for the implemen- (20) tation of federal Indian policy. Many commentators believe that this change had already occurred in 1871 when— following a dispute between the House and the Senate over which (25) chamber should enjoy primacy in Indian affairs—Congress abolished the making of treaties with Native American tribes. But in reality the federal government continued to nego- (30) tiate formal tribal agreements past the turn of the century, treating these documents not as treaties with sover- eign nations requiring ratification by the
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 6
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page3 / 21

A A greater percentage of Swiss industrial workers than...

This preview shows document pages 3 - 6. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon bookmark
Ask a homework question - tutors are online