organization, and who have membership that is identifiable to those on the team and not on the team; the team has a common goaloTeam Effectiveness: measured on several dimensionsKnowledge Criteria: degree to which team increases its performance capabilities9
Must be diversity in knowledge, knowledge must be shared, must have learning over time (do you get better?)Affective Criteria: whether team members have a fulfilling/satisfying experienceOutcome Criteria: quantity and quality of the team’s output (comes in parts – did you get research done, meet writing center requirement, get a good grade)Synergy v. Process LossoSynergy: the total output of the team is greater than the combined outputs of individual members working aloneoProcess Loss: time and energy spent on maintaining the team as opposed to working on the team’s tasksInfluences on Team EffectivenessoComposition: who is on the team and what they bring to the teamDiversity: depends on task, outcomes, time, type of diversity; good when it is complex; improves performance when it is accompanied by different points of view/different informationPersonality: agreeableness and emotional stability help with maintenance, conscientiousness helps with performanceSize: inverted U (bigger team=higher performance to a point) vs. linear performance (bigger team=higher performance)oStructure: what does the task look likeMember Roles:Norms: people look for similaritiesTask Structure: determines whether you need a group or notDivisible (can be broken down into smaller tasks – group paper) vs. Unitary (done in one segment – knitting)Maximization(quantity) vs. Optimization(quality)Additive(don’t need teamwork, series of unitary tasks – data entry), Compensatory(task at hand benefits from information play – forecasting estimates), Disjunctive(teams must work together to come to one decision– juries), Conjunctive(work to be done is sequential – assembly line)oProcesses: what goes on in the team (communication, conflict, etc.)Cohesion: extent to which people like the team because of group’s positive affectInterpersonal: like being on the team because they are friendsTask: like being on team because same goal (better cohesion/performance)Conflict: Personal: hurts cohesion; people not liking each other, having stereotypesSubstantive/Task: can be good for team performance; argue about what would have happened if x happened (leads to creative solutions)Procedural: hurts cohesion; not being able to meet, disagreeing, etc. Social Facilitating: argues that the presence of others makes us perform better (not true in test taking, public speaking)Social Loafing: diffusion of responsibility (chores Communication: oTeam Development: how the team develops over time10
Stage Model: explains best teams that work together for a long timeForming: getting to know each otherStorming: disagreement/tension among membersNorming: cohesiveness and roles developPerformance: high task and goal orientationAdjourning: task completion, termination of roles