Hunter s t bedell k e mumford m d 2007 climate for

Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative
review. Creativity Research Journal , 19, 69 – 90.
Isaksen, S. G., & Ekvall, G. (2010). Managing for innovation: The two faces of tension
within creative climates. Creativity and Innovation Management , 19 , 2, 73 – 88.
Isaksen, S.G., Lauer, K.J. & Ekvall, G. (1999). Situational outlook questionnaire: A measure
of the climate for creativity and change . Psychological Reports , Vol. 85, pp. 665 – 674.
Isaksen, S. G. & Lauer, K. J. (2002). The climate for creativity and change in teams.
Creativity and Innovation Management , 11, 74 – 86.
Isaksen, S. G., & Tidd, J. (2006). Meeting the innovation challenge: Leadership for
transformation and growth . Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Janang, J.T., Suhaimi, R., & Salamudin, N. (2011). Technical efficiency estimation of
government linked companies in Malaysia. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 7 ,
6, 555-564.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work
behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, pp. 287-302.
Janssen, O, van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and
group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 25, 129 –
145.
Jaskyte, K., & Audrone, K . ( 2006) . Organizational innovation: A comparison of non-profit
human service organizations in Lithuania and the United States . International Social Work,
49 , 2 , 165 – 1 76 .
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
27
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of
Management Review , 31, 386 – 408.
Johnson, B. (2005). Design ideation: The conceptual sketch in the digital age. Design Studies ,
26 , 6, 613-624.
Joyce, W. F. and Slocum, J. W. Jr. (1984), “Collective climate: Agreement as a basis for
defining aggregate climates in organizations”, Academy Management Journal , 27, 721-
741.
Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective and social
conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Straw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.),
Research in Organizational Behaviour (Vol. 10 , pp. 123 – 167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Khazanah (2013). ‘Khazanah Nasional FAQ’, Retrieved from
(October 13, 2014).
King, E. B., De Chermont, K., West, M. A., Dawson, J. F., & Hebl, M. R. (2007). How
innovation can alleviate negative consequences of demanding work contexts: The influence
of climate for innovation on organizational outcomes. Journal of occupational and
organizational psychology , 80 , 4, 631 – 645.
Kissi, J., Dainty, A. R. J., & Liu, A . (2012). Examining middle managers’ influence on
innovation in construction professional services firms: A tale of three innovations.
Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 12, 1, 11 – 28.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2
nd
Ed.) . New
York: The Guilford Press.
Konrad, A. M., & F. Linnehan, F. (1995). Formalized HRM structures: Coordinating equal
employment opportunity or concealing organizational practices? Academy of Management
Journal, 38 , 787-820.