{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Answer q34 although people in france consume fatty

Info iconThis preview shows pages 17–20. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Answer: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Q34: Although people in France consume fatty foods at a rate comparable to the United States, their death rates from heart disease are far lower in France. A. people in France consume fatty foods at a rate comparable to the United States, their B. people in France and the United States consume fatty foods at about the same rate, the C. fatty foods are consumed by people in France at a comparable rate to the United States’s, their D. the rate of fatty foods consumed in France and the United States is about the same, the E. the rate of people consuming fatty foods is about the same in France and the United States, the Answer: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Q35 to Q37: In corporate purchasing, competitive scrutiny is typically limited to suppliers of items that are Line directly related to end products. (5) With “indirect” purchases (such as computers, advertising, and legal services), which are not directly 31
Background image of page 17

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
related to production, corporations often favor “supplier partnerships” (10) (arrangements in which the purchaser forgoes the right to pursue alternative suppliers), which can inappropriately shelter suppliers from rigorous competitive scrutiny (15) that might afford the purchaser economic leverage. There are two independent variables—availability of alternatives and ease of changing suppliers—that companies should (20) use to evaluate the feasibility of subjecting suppliers of indirect purchases to competitive scrutiny. This can create four possible situations. (25) In Type 1 situations, there are many alternatives and change is relatively easy. Open pursuit of alternatives—by frequent com- petitive bidding, if possible—will (30) likely yield the best results. In Type 2 situations, where there are many alternatives but change is difficult—as for providers of employee health-care benefits—it (35) is important to continuously test the market and use the results to secure concessions from existing suppliers. Alternatives provide a credible threat to suppliers, even if (40) the ability to switch is constrained. In Type 3 situations, there are few alternatives, but the ability to switch without difficulty creates a threat that companies can use to negotiate (45) concessions from existing suppliers. In Type 4 situations, where there are few alternatives and change is difficult, partnerships may be unavoidable. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q35: Which of the following best describes the relation of the second paragraph to the first? 32
Background image of page 18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background image of page 19

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 20
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}