Level II in other methods listed inSection 3 of this Recommended Practiceas defined in the employer’s writtenpractice.Inquiry 91-4According to SNT-TC-1A (1984edition), when an employee has beentested to Level III requirements by anoutside agency and certified as aLevel III by his or her employer on thebasis of these tests:1. Can the employee be recertifiedbased on the employer’s statementof continuing satisfactoryperformance?2. What constitutes “evidence ofcontinuing satisfactoryperformance”?3. Must the certification be given byanother NDT Level III employedby the company or may it be givenby a company official?Inquiry 91-2Does Recommended Practice No.SNT-TC-1A(1984 edition) exclude anemployer from developing its writtenpractice utilizing visual examination asan NDT method?ResponseNo. As previously stated in theresponse to Inquiry 78-7 and 80-8, theintent of Paragraph 1.4 is to provide theemployer adequate flexibility toaccommodate a variety of special needsas documented in a written practice.Inquiry 91-3May a Level III or his designatedrepresentative administer eyeexaminations? According toParagraph 8.1, a Level III or hisdesignated representative shalladminister and grade the examinationsspecified in Section 8.3 to 8.8. Paragraph8.2 (which covers eye exams) is notaddressed in this statement nor are anyqualified individuals addressed in 8.2.Should Paragraph 8.1 read “8.2 through8.8” or are Level IIIs not permitted toadminister eye exams and if so, who is?ResponseAs previously stated in the response toInquiry 78-11, it is intended thatLevel III personnel be allowed toadminister the near-distance vision acuityexamination. However, if the employerelects to use other methods of visionexamination, it may be necessary to usepersonnel with other specializedqualifications to administer theexamination. The employer shouldinclude details of the qualificationsrequired of examiners in the writtenpractice.Response1. Paragraph 9.7.1 of SNT-TC-1Aallows for recertification withevidence of continuing satisfactoryperformance. An employee may berecertified with evidence ofcontinuing satisfactory performanceif addressed in the employer’swritten practice.2. The intent of “evidence ofcontinuing satisfactoryperformance” in Paragraph 9.7.1 ofSNT-TC-1A is that the employershall have objective evidence of anindividual’s satisfactory perfor-mance during the previous certifi-cation period of the appropriateduties outlined in the employer’swritten practice.3. As previously stated in the responseto Inquiry 90-1, the inference of thestatement “signature of designatedrepresentative” in Paragraph9.6.1.10 is that whoever isidentified by the employer in theirwritten practice as the designatedrepresentative may sign the recordof certification.Inquiry 91-5Is it the intent of Table 6.3.1 (1984edition) that, for initial certification toLevel III PT, the recommended threemonths of experience must beaccumulated in consecutive months?Assuming the individual is being certified