100%(18)18 out of 18 people found this document helpful
This preview shows page 3 - 5 out of 5 pages.
obtaining key relationships from the gathered data challenging. It is vital that some researchesdepending on the subject, utilize a larger sample size to warrant a representative distribution ofpopulation. In relation to the methods used to gather data, some studies have omitted somedetails which they must have deemed not that significant but in reality, could have helpedaddress the issue as well as assisted future research studies of the same subject. Self-reporteddata, on the other hand, is limited as it can rarely be independently verified (Boltz, Capezuti,Fulmer, & Zwicker, 2016). This is primarily due to individuals’ views in focus groups,conversations, and questionnaires at face value. There are also the researches that faced adeficiency of accessible and reliable data which leads to the limitation of the scope of theanalysis. Evidence-based practice (EBP) although somewhat in its early to middle stages, isgradually being embraced in the healthcare industry (Boltz, Capezuti, Fulmer, & Zwicker, 2016).To this effect, researchers are facing obstacles or longer than usual outcomes and conclusionsdue to the lack of research precedents. Conclusion3
LITERATURE REVIEWLiterature review supports the PICOT in diverse ways. It facilitates the study or research to collect evidence established on what is known and foresee what is unknown. Reviewing literatures have paved the way on finding out how patient falls research studies compare when it comes to sample size, research queries, and study limitations. The contrasting and comparison