Procedural History
:
Trial court ruled no contract had been formed and awarded
judgment to Norfolk.
Lucier appealed.
Issue
:
Was a contract formed? If so, was it for $175 per week or $35 per day?
Holding
:
No contract was formed. Trial court’s judgment affirmed.
Rationale
:
Based on prior dealings and terms of invitation to bid, Board thought
Lucier’s bid (offer) was simply a different way of stating the per day rate.
However, Lucier intended to insist on the weekly rate (by which he would be paid
the weekly rate even if there was a holiday during the week) and thought Board
19

Ch. 11 – Acceptance
•
UCC Rejects “Mirror Image”
Rule for sales of goods
–
Acceptance that adds to or
differs from original offer may
still be effective
–
Rationale: Commercial
contracts for sale of goods
often not fully negotiated
–
Buyer uses its own form for
offer and seller uses its own
•
To prevent “Battle of the
Forms,” UCC reverses
common law presumption
that acceptance with
different terms is a
rejection and counteroffer,
20

Ch. 11 – Acceptance
UCC 2-207 (Anti-Battle of Forms provision)
1.
Definite and timely expression of acceptance or written confirmation operates
as an acceptance even though it states additional or different terms,
unless
acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or
different terms
2.
With non-merchants, different or additional terms do
not become part of the
contract unless the offeror expressly agrees to them; rather they are
considered proposals (but contract still exists)
a.
Between
merchants,
additional (but not different) terms become part of
the contract unless:
i.
Original offer expressly limited acceptance to the terms of the offer
ii.
New terms materially alter offer; or
iii.
Notification of objection is given within reasonable time
3.
Conduct by both parties which recognizes existence of a contract is sufficient
to establish a contract for sale even though writings of the parties reflect
21

Ch. 11 – Acceptance
•
When Does Acceptance Take
Effect?
–
Offers, revocations and rejections
are effective when communicated
(i.e.,
received)
–
Acceptance also effective when
communicated (i.e., received), but is
also effective when
sent
IF
the
communication medium chosen is
reasonable (“mailbox rule,” “postal
rule” or “reasonable medium rule”)
–
Medium is reasonable when
22

Ch. 11 – Acceptance
•
But of course, there are exceptions:
–
When offeror specifies that acceptance effective
only when received (“master of the offer”)
–
When offeror specifies that a particular medium
be used to communicate acceptance
–
When offeree mails a rejection first and then
changes mind and sends an acceptance – the
first one actually received by the offeror is
effective
•
Note: Courts have held that emails are not
effective when sent but only when received
at recipient’s server (even if not read)
23

Ch. 11 – Acceptance
Cushing v. Thomson (Sup. Ct. N.H. 1978)
24

Ch. 11 – Acceptance
Facts
: In March 1973, Clamshell Alliance, an


You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 41 pages?
- Spring '08
- Baker
- Ch., Lucier, LACLEDE