bkmsol_ch08

# 8 2 3 a the two figures depict the stocks security

This preview shows pages 2–6. Sign up to view the full content.

8-2

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
3. a. The two figures depict the stocks’ security characteristic lines (SCL). Stock A has higher firm-specific risk because the deviations of the observations from the SCL are larger for Stock A than for Stock B. Deviations are measured by the vertical distance of each observation from the SCL. b. Beta is the slope of the SCL, which is the measure of systematic risk. The SCL for Stock B is steeper; hence Stock B’s systematic risk is greater. c. The R 2 (or squared correlation coefficient) of the SCL is the ratio of the explained variance of the stock’s return to total variance, and the total variance is the sum of the explained variance plus the unexplained variance (the stock’s residual variance): ) (e σ σ β σ β R i 2 2 M 2 i 2 M 2 i 2 + = Since the explained variance for Stock B is greater than for Stock A (the explained variance is , which is greater since its beta is higher), and its residual variance σ 2 M 2 B σ β 2 (e B ) is smaller, its R 2 is higher than Stock A’s. d. Alpha is the intercept of the SCL with the expected return axis. Stock A has a small positive alpha whereas Stock B has a negative alpha; hence, Stock A’s alpha is larger. e. The correlation coefficient is simply the square root of R 2 , so Stock B’s correlation with the market is higher. 4. a. Firm-specific risk is measured by the residual standard deviation. Thus, stock A has more firm-specific risk: 10.3% > 9.1% b. Market risk is measured by beta, the slope coefficient of the regression. A has a larger beta coefficient: 1.2 > 0.8 c. R 2 measures the fraction of total variance of return explained by the market return. A’s R 2 is larger than B’s: 0.576 > 0.436 d. Rewriting the SCL equation in terms of total return (r) rather than excess return (R): r A – r f = α + β (r M – r f ) r A = α + r f (1 β) + β r M The intercept is now equal to: α + r f (1 β) = 1 + r f (l – 1.2) Since r f = 6%, the intercept would be: 1 – 1.2 = –0.2% 8-3
5. The standard deviation of each stock can be derived from the following equation for R 2 : = σ σ β = 2 i 2 M 2 i 2 i R Explained variance Total variance Therefore: % 30 . 31 980 20 . 0 20 7 . 0 R A 2 2 2 A 2 M 2 A 2 A = σ = × = σ β = σ For stock B: % 28 . 69 800 , 4 12 . 0 20 2 . 1 B 2 2 2 B = σ = × = σ 6. The systematic risk for A is: 196 20 70 . 0 2 2 2 M 2 A = × = σ β The firm-specific risk of A (the residual variance) is the difference between A’s total risk and its systematic risk: 980 – 196 = 784 The systematic risk for B is: 576 20 20 . 1 2 2 2 M 2 B = × = σ β B’s firm-specific risk (residual variance) is: 4800 – 576 = 4224 7. The covariance between the returns of A and B is (since the residuals are assumed to be uncorrelated): 336 400 20 . 1 70 . 0 ) r , r ( Cov 2 M B A B A = × × = σ β β = The correlation coefficient between the returns of A and B is: 155 . 0 28 . 69 30 . 31 336 ) r , r ( Cov B A B A AB = × = σ σ = ρ 8-4

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
8. Note that the correlation is the square root of R 2 : 2 R = ρ Cov(r A ,r M ) = ρσ A σ M = 0.20 1/2 × 31.30 × 20 = 280 Cov(r B ,r M ) = ρσ B σ M = 0.12 1/2 × 69.28 × 20 = 480 9. For portfolio P we can compute: σ P = [(0.6 2 × 980) + (0.4 2 × 4800) + (2 × 0.4 × 0.6 × 336] 1/2 = [1282.08] 1/2 = 35.81% β P = (0.6 × 0.7) + (0.4 × 1.2) = 0.90 958.08 400) (0.90 1282.08
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page2 / 13

8 2 3 a The two figures depict the stocks security...

This preview shows document pages 2 - 6. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online