of the senior evaluators’ presentations (DeLaat, 2007). Discouragingly, the people regarded as senior evaluators lacked ideas on technical expertise concerning presentation of the information. The level of discrimination was far much irritating. Its like you are denied to make change which you are capable of while some other inexperience people are awarded the opportunity. Finally, there is a kind of sex discrimination experienced by Ms. Anderson when she was offered operations project jobs. Before this, she had agreed to substitute a 3-week home leave rotation for a standards 6-week rotation, thus, she had to reduce home rotation as well. Working in operations project, she set pace at work for other employees in line with the presentation of analytical material and staffing recommendation. However, she received false allegations through unusual memos from Mr. Lawton head of operations. The memos were composed of minor matters of work schedule like arriving at work an hour late although she was even at nights and weekends. With this, she was passed to the evaluator’s meetings and her earnings were made due just because of these minor allegations from the memos. Hence, discrimination in the workplace must be mitigated in order for smooth operation and adaptable skill within the organization.
Reference DeLaat, J. (2007). Gender in the Workplace- A Case Study Approach (2 nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 5 pages?