Palo alto ca mind garden 6 bass bm 1990 from

Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
6. Bass, B.M., 1990. From transactional to transformational leadership:
Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics , 18 (3) pp. 19–31
7. Bem, S. L., 1974. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 , 155-162.
8. Bem, S. L., 1978. Beyond androgyny: Some presumptuous prescriptions for a
liberated sexual identity. In J. Sherman & F. Denmark (Eds.), The Future of
Women: Issues in Psychology. New York: Psychological Dimensions.
9. Billing, Y.D. & Alvesson, M., 2000. “Questioning the Notion of Feminine
Leadership: A Critical Perspective on the Gender Labeling of leadership”,
Gender, Work and Organization , Vol. 7, No 3, pp. 144-157
10. Burgess, D. & Borgida, E., 1999. Who women are, who women should be:
Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping and sex discrimination.
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665–692.
11. Burns, J. M., 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper and Row. Pp 50
12. Cann, A. and Siegfried, W.D., 1990. “Gender stereotypes and dimensions of
effective leader behavior”, Sex Roles , Vol. 23, pp. 413-19.
13. Chapman, P., 2009. Educating major programme managers: Hopes, fears and
speculations. (Saïd Business School), In: Educating Programme Managers

69
for the 21st Century Conference, 22- 23 June 2009, University of Oxford,
Oxford.
14. Cleland, D. I., 1995. Leadership and the project-management body of
knowledge, International Journal of Project Management , Volume 13, Issue
2, April 1995, Pages 83- 88.
15. Connell, R., 2009. Gender: In World Perspective. (2nd ed.), Cambridge, UK.:
Polity.
16. Davis, K., 1967. Human Relations at Work . 3rd Ed. McGraw-Hill, USA 96-
97.
17. de la Rey, C. (2005). Gender, Women and Leadership. Women and
Leadership No. 65, pp. 4-11
18. Denmark, F. L., 1977. Styles of leadership. Psychology of Women Quarterly ,
2(2), 99-113
19. Druskat, V. U., 1994. Gender and leadership style: Transformational and
transactional leadership in the Roman Catholic Church, The Leadership
Quarterly , Volume 5, Issue 2, Summer 1994, Pages 99–119
20. Durkheim, E., 1964. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free
Press, in Walker, Henry A., Barbara C. Ilardi, Anne M. McMahon, and Mary
L. Fennell. 1996. “Gender, Interaction, and Leadership.” Social Psychology
Quarterly 63:175-185.
21. Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J., 2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward
female leaders. Psychological Review , 109, 573–598.
22. Eagly, A.H. and Johnson, B.T., 1990. “Gender and leadership style: a meta-
analysis”, Psychological Bulletin , Vol. 108, pp. 233-56.
23. Errington, S., 1990. “Recasting Sex, Gender, and Power: A Theoretical and
Regional Overview” in J.M. Atkinson and S. Errington (eds) Power and
Difference: Gender in Island Southeast Asia, Stanford: Stanford University
Press, 1-58.
24. Fagenson, E. A. and Jackson, J. J., 1993. “The Status of Women Managers in
the United States,” International Studies of Management and Organizations .
23: 93-122.
25. Ferns, D.C., 1991. Developments in Program management. International
Journal of Project Management, Vol.9 (3), p.148-156.
26. Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N. and Rothengatter, W., 2003. Megaprojects and
Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

70
27. Gartzia, L. and van Engen, M., 2012. "Are (male) leaders "feminine"
enough?: Gendered traits of identity as mediators of sex differences in
leadership styles",