American journal of sociology Peer review journal Process If you created

American journal of sociology peer review journal

This preview shows page 2 out of 2 pages.

American journal of sociology Peer- review journal Process If you created research, take your report and send to editor of a journal who sends it to reviewers R3-5 reviewers (academics with a similar expertise) R&R- revise and resubmit if editors think there is merit Advantage- identifies high quality knowledge, adds perspectives Disadvantage- inefficient (takes too long), high quality information that doesn’t get released to the public editor/ reviewer bias, aren’t keen on pushing the envelope The Sokal Affair- what might happen if there wasnt a peer reviewd process Physics professor sent a manuscript to Duke Saturated postmodern Revealed that the paper was a hoax They were driven by idiology Conducting a literature review Organization Read 100 studies in the area, pull out conceptual themes (theories, ideas) Listing does not synthesize the ideas Proper literature review- coherently synthesizing ideas, here are main things and the gaps
Image of page 2

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read both pages?

  • Spring '19
  • Academic publishing, R3-5 reviewers

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

Stuck? We have tutors online 24/7 who can help you get unstuck.
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes