Supreme Court Analysis.docx

This was taken to court in the case of schenck vs

Info icon This preview shows pages 3–5. Sign up to view the full content.

Amendment. This was taken to court in the case of Schenck vs. United States. Among the judges of the Supreme Court during this time were Oliver Wendell Holmes, Joseph McKenna, and James Clark McReynolds. All nine of these judges were white males. Eventually, Charles T. Schenck was charged with ten years in federal prison for this misdemeanor. SCHENCK VS. UNITED STATES Opinions of the Court: The Supreme Court made a unanimous decision that the free speech clause of the First Amendment has its limitations if the speech poses as a “clear and present danger.” There was no
Image of page 3

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

Supreme Court Analysis 4 dissenting opinion or minority opinion; the ruling was nine to zero. With the Espionage Act, and with the rulings in Schenck vs. United States, Congress enacted its wartime powers under Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. As the dealings of the Espionage Act and thus the ruling of Schenck vs. United States are not specifically addressed in the Constitution, the Supreme Court used judicial activism in relation to this case. The Court supplied an implied power, the right to restrict free speech during wartime, to set a precedent for the limits on free speech in general. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes delivered this opinion and made the famous reference to “shouting ‘fire!’ in a crowded theater.” He argued that in the preceding example, the First Amendment would not protect the man who yelled “fire!” without reason because his exercise of his freedoms of speech threatened public safety. In other words, Charles Schenck’s pamphlets posed as a “clear and present danger,” a term that would endure for some time after Schenck vs. United States. Although there was no dissenting opinion, Justice Holmes did concede that during peacetime, Charles Schenck’s actions would have been counted as simply an expression of opinion. In the tumultuous times of World War I however, his freedom of speech
Image of page 4
Image of page 5
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
  • Fall '16
  • Raymond
  • The American, Supreme Court of the United States, First Amendment to the United States Constitution, Charles T. Schenck

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern