{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Chapter 8 - Solution Manual

That if we report these costs as assets we would be

Info iconThis preview shows pages 22–24. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
that if we report these costs as assets we would be violating the qualitative characteristic of
Background image of page 22

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
166 representational faithfulness. We would be reporting a non-asset as an asset. Thus, it would not be what it purports to be. SFAC No. 6 defines an asset as a probable future economic benefit obtained or controlled by a particular entity as a result of a past transaction. Neither removing the tanks at a cost of $40,000 nor incurring a $30,000 expenditure to refine the soil once the tanks are removed does not increase the expected future cash inflow from the operation of the restaurant. Thus, it provides no future benefit and is not an asset. Furthermore, if we were to purchase an identical adjacent site that does not have a service station on it, the current site would not be more valuable than the adjacent site. Since both sites could be used to generate the same future cash flows and profit, one is not more valuable than the other. As a result, if we were to capitalize the costs of removing the tanks and refining the soil, we contend that the historical cost of the land would be overstated. Is not the initial value of an asset equivalent to the present value of the future cash flows expected from its use? With regard to the capitalization of the $22,000 of “so called” avoidable interest that is incurred during construction, we can make similar arguments. It does not add to the future service potential of the building because it has no impact on the future cash flows or profit expected from the building’s use and thus does not add to its value. Moreover, the source of financing has nothing to do with the cost or value of the asset itself. Modern finance theory would separate the two. What would make a building financed with debt more valuable than a building that was financed with equity? Nothing would. If Entre financed the building with equity it would produce the same future cash flows as it would if he financed it with debt. Moreover, we could argue that the cost of financing with equity is potentially more expensive than the cost of financing with debt. Due to the riskiness associated with uncertain returns to investors, the return on an equity investment is generally higher than the company’s incremental borrowing rate. We argue that if capitalization of avoidable interest should be added to the cost of the asset, then so should the avoidable cost of capital that is effectively incurred when financing the construction with equity. WWW Case 8-11 The gross method of recording inventory is easy to apply. Purchases are recorded at the gross price. When a discount is taken, it is recorded as discounts taken. However, at the end of the accounting period, net purchases will be overstated unless adjusted for discounts that are expected not to be taken. Also, this method does not take into consideration that the discount theoretically represents interest on the net amount borrowed. Finally, the method does not highlight the cost of not taking discounts.
Background image of page 23
Image of page 24
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page22 / 24

that if we report these costs as assets we would be...

This preview shows document pages 22 - 24. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon bookmark
Ask a homework question - tutors are online