about intervening on the supply side of health care A Most companies do not

About intervening on the supply side of health care a

This preview shows page 73 - 76 out of 174 pages.

about intervening on the supply side of health care? (A)Most companies do not have enough employees to make on-site clinics cost-effective. (B)Many companies with on-site clinics offer their employees the option of going outside the company's system to obtain health care. (C)The costs of establishing and running an on-site clinic are demonstrably higher than the costs of paying for health care from an outside provider. (D)Companies with health care clinics find that employees are unwilling to assist in controlling the costs of health care. (E)Employees at companies with on-site clinics seek preventive screening and are thus less likely to delay medical treatment. 题目释义: 细节题目
Image of page 73
ChaseDream GMATPrep 2007 阅读笔记 Practice Test #1 67 考点: 逻辑结构( Logical structure 旨在考察我们对文章结构的认知,以及对作者行文目的的判断。 这道题首先我们要知道作者看待“ intervening on the supply side of health care ”的态度。这 是作者提出的一个方法,自己肯定持肯定态度。然后根据文中出现的细节就可以解题了。 选项分析: (A) 大部分公司都没有足够的员工来让 on-site clinics 划算 这个选项是否定的态度。相反 的,它削弱了作者的观点。 (B) 许多有 on-site clinics 的公司都提供员工去公司外的地方执行医疗保障的选项。 如果 这个选项是对的,那么作者提出的这个双赢的办法就被削弱了。( on-site clinics 公司都提供员工去公司外的地方执行医疗保障 ---- on-site clinics 形同虚设)。 (C) 建立和运营 on-site clinics 比让员工去公司外执行医疗保障花费更大。 这个选项定位 employees receive health care at an on-site clinic maintained by the company. The clinic fosters morale, resulting in a low rate of employees leaving the company. Additionally, the company has constrained the growth of health care costs while expanding medical services. 。如果这个花费 大于去公司外的花费,那么省钱的初衷就无法达到了。所以不支持作者的观点。 (D) 有医疗保障诊所的公司发现员工不愿意支持公司控制医疗保障经费。 如果员工不支持, 那么就不会来公司自带的诊所,以前的问题依旧存在。所以这个选项也不支持作者的观 点。 (E) Correct 。有 on-site clinics 的公司员工会进行预防性检查,因此不会耽误病情。 员工 不愿意进行预防性检查是以前的方法的弊病。如果现在可以解决,那无疑是支持了作者 的肯定态度。
Image of page 74