business-reporting-july-2010-marks-plan

Actuarial difference 205 12 net actuarial difference

Info iconThis preview shows pages 5–8. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Actuarial difference (205) 12 Net actuarial difference (193) Appendix 5: Basic EPS 2010 2009 £'000 £'000 Profit after tax 2,085 1,699 Shares at start and end of year *1,475 1,400 Basic EPS £1.41 £1.21 *6/12 x 1,400,000 = 700,000 6/12 x 1,550,000 = 775,000 1,475,000
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
TI BR – Advanced Stage – July 2010 © The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales 2010 6 Appendix 6: Diluted EPS Diluted EPS Earnings Shares £'000 Basic 2,085 1475 Share Options (see below) 36 Total 2,085 1511 Diluted EPS £1.38 Share Options £'000 Maximum cash raised from shares (19 x 10,000 x £39) 7,410 Shares issued at average price in year £‘000 (£7.41m/£48) 154 Maximum shares issued (£7.41/£39) 190 Free' shares 36 *Tutorial Note* IAS33 does state that the dilution in relation to the shares should be treated as if issued at the beginning of the year or (if later) the date of issue of the financial instrument concerned. If this is the case there is an argument for saying the number of ‘free’ shares should be 36 x 9/12 =27. Equal credit was given in the marking guide for both approaches. Examiner’s comments This question was generally well answered with the majority of candidates displaying a sound technical knowledge. Answers were, in the majority of cases, well structured and clearly laid out following the structure of the question. It was rare that candidates omitted complete sections of the question and most candidates achieved a pass on this question. A majority of candidates were able to give correct explanations for the treatment of the three issues. In addition the calculations for the share option and pension schemes were mostly accurate with most mistakes being due to carelessness rather than errors of principle The standard of the revised statements of comprehensive income was more mixed with many candidates not correctly adjusting against the appropriate headings, although at least in most cases they did make some attempt to do so. Almost all candidates correctly identified the goodwill adjustment. A surprising number of candidates were unable to calculate the correct number of shares required in the basic EPS computation. Hardly any students correctly calculated the number of free shares for the diluted EPS, although quite a few made a reasonable attempt. Many students did not attempt this part. A weak aspect of the candidates’ performance in respect of this question was in summarising and concluding the impact of the adjustments on the EPS.
Background image of page 6
TI BR – Advanced Stage – July 2010 © The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales 2010 7 BR Question 2 - Pepper Art Scenario The candidate is in the role of a member of a tax department advising a client Pepper Art. The key skills in this question required of the candidate are reviewing, assimilation and judgement in providing advice to the client regarding the client’s tax liabilities. In terms of skills the candidate needs to identify errors in a tax computation provided by the client and identify potential VAT liabilities arising from the application of capital
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 8
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page5 / 24

Actuarial difference 205 12 Net actuarial difference 193...

This preview shows document pages 5 - 8. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online