{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Conductor industrysuggest that firms do not

Info iconThis preview shows pages 4–6. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
conductor industry—suggest that firms do not necessarily become more innovative as they increase their patenting (15) activity. Ziedonis and Hall, for example, found that investment in research and development (a reasonable proxy for innovation) did (20) not substantially increase between 1982 and 1992, the industry’s most feverish period of patenting. Instead, semiconductor firms simply (25) squeezed more patents out of existing research and development expenditures. Moreover, Ziedonis and Hall found that as patenting (30) activity at semiconductor firms increased in the 1980’s, the consensus among industry employees was that the average quality (35) of their firms’ patents declined. Though patent quality is a difficult notion to measure, the number of times a patent is cited in (40) the technical literature is a reasonable yardstick, and citations per semiconductor patent did decline during the 1980’s. This decline in (45) quality may be related to changes in the way semi- conductor firms managed their patenting process: 4
Background image of page 4

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
rather than patenting to win (50) exclusive rights to a valuable new technology, patents were filed more for strategic purposes, to be used as bargaining chips to ward (55) off infringement suites or as a means to block competitors’ products. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q7: The passage is primarily concerned with discussing A. a study suggesting that the semiconductor industry’s approach to patenting during the period from 1982 to 1992 yielded unanticipated results B. a study of the semiconductor industry during the period from 1982 to 1992 that advocates certain changes in the industry’s management of the patenting process C. the connection between patenting and innovation in the semiconductor industry during the period from 1982 to 1992 D. reasons that investment in research and development in the semiconductor industry did not increase significantly during the period from 1982 to 1992 E. certain factors that made the period from 1982 to 1992 a time of intense patenting activity in the semiconductor industry Answer: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q8: The passage suggests which of the following about patenting in the semiconductor industry during the period from 1982 to 1992 ? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background image of page 5
Image of page 6
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}