Other legal theories applicable to marks scenario

This preview shows page 4 - 7 out of 8 pages.

Other legal theories applicable to Mark’s scenario include agency law and the legal concept of the statute of frauds. Agency law is a concept in commercial law that deals with contractual relationships involving the agent who is authorized to enter into a contract on behalf of the principal and a third party. According to the Law Teacher (2018), the agency is the relationship that exists between the principal and the agent. The agent act for and on behalf of the principal and may affect a contract between the principal and the third party. In this scenario, the manager is an agent representing Turnip Plaza Hotel which is the principal. Therefore, Mark can hold the hotel to Edward’s promise because he is legally an agent. The statute of frauds, on the other hand, deals with disputes that arise from oral contracts. The statute of frauds requires
THE TURNIP PLAZA HOTEL ANALYSIS 5 certain types of contacts to be written in order to be enforceable. In case of a breach of contract, it upon the plaintiff to proof that a valid contract indeed existed. The defendant has the right to raise the issues as a defense. In this case, if Mark decides to sue Turnip Plaza Hotel for breach of contract there is high likelihood that he will lose the case because their contract with Edward was oral hence does not meet the principle condition of the statute of frauds. The statute requires the contract to be written in a single document to be enforceable. Contract Damages and Remedies If Mark decides to sue the hotel for breach of contract through the court, he would be entitled to different remedies and damages. Remedies are the legal method used to enforce rights and redress wrongs orchestrated against an individual. The court will use the contract remedy decision tree to decide if Mark will be compensated for the injustice. Mark will receive equitable and monetary remedies if the contract is found to be valid and enforceable. In case the contract is invalid and enforceable, Mark will seek remedy using the concept of promissory estoppel. In the scenario, a breach of contract has occurred because the Turnip Plaza Hotel has failed to honor its obligation to Mark. The following are damages and remedies entitled to Mark Piper. Mark will receive nominal damages from Turnip Plaza Hotel for the breach of contract. Nominal damages are a small amount of money awarded to the plaintiff by the court for breach of contract. It is awarded to the plaintiff to remedy financial loss resulting from the breach of contract. In this case, Mark will be remedied nominal damages because he has lost his job and didn’t receive a two-term contract as promised by the manager. Secondly, Mark will be awarded compensatory damages. Compensatory damages are remedies awarded to the plaintiff by the court in order to put him on the same position as if the contact had been honored. For instance,
THE TURNIP PLAZA HOTEL ANALYSIS 6 the court might ask the hotel to offer Mark a new contract as compensatory damages. Mark is

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture