Point Individuals Should Have the Right to Set Ethics for Robotc Systems They

Point individuals should have the right to set ethics

This preview shows page 27 - 30 out of 56 pages.

Point: Individuals Should Have the Right to Set Ethics for Robotc Systems They Own. Counterpoint: Robotc Ethics Should Be Controlled by the Governments or Manufacturers. Intellectual Property: 3D Printng: Who Is Responsible When Things Go Awry?: Summary of the Issue: Cost of 3D printers dropping = soon to be practcal + efectve. Patents protect intellectual property. Downloaded by remy hakim ([email protected]) lOMoARcPSD|4103943
Who’s going to take responsibility for possible faws in printng causing accidents? How do we preserve intellectual property rights? Point: Regulatng 3D Printng Protects Designers and the Public. Counterpoint: Unregulated 3D Printng Encourages Creatvity. Privacy: Human-Implanted Data Chips: Protecton of Orwellian Nightmare?: Summary of the Issue: Many ppl perceive privacy as a basic human right. VeriChip (now PositveID) is FDA approved since 2004. Chip implanted in human body makes many ppl extremely uncomfortable. Very debatable + sensitve topic. Point: Chip Implants Would Beneft Society. Counterpoint: Chip Implants Would Lead to An Erosion of Personal Privacy. Property Rights: Mining an Asteroid: Who Owns Outer Space?: Summary of the Issue: Development of technology hardware requires lots of rare metals. Outer Space solids like asteroids + other planets = possible wealthy source of minerals + metals. OUTER SPACE TREATY (OST): 1967 treaty resultng from cold way = major law governing ownership of extraterrestrial territory. Who owns the moon? Point: Outer Space Belongs to the Human Race. Counterpoint: Outer Space Can Be Claimed by Private Companies. Electronic Informaton Access: Should Everyone Have Free Access to Uncensored Informaton?: Summary of the Issue: BAIDU.COM : Leading Chinese search engine. Many countries have their Internet blocked by government restrictons like India and China. Financial Results versus Social Implicatons? Point: US Companies Should Comply With Local Laws in Foreign Countries. Counterpoint: US Companies should Put What is Right Ahead of What is Financially Expedient. Computer Abuse: Hacktvism: Civil Disobedience or Terrorism?: Summary of the Issue: Civil disobedience + right to assemble and protest = basic libertes for Americans. Downloaded by remy hakim ([email protected]) lOMoARcPSD|4103943
HACKTIVISM: involves using computers + networks in subversive way to promote agenda related to causes like free speech, human rights, informaton freedom = computer hacking for social change. Cyberterrorism. Is it civil disobedience 21st-century style? Point: Hacking is A Natural Extension of Civil Disobedience. Counterpoint: Hacktvism is Illegal and Therefore Wrong. Using Computers to Support Ethical Conduct: Positve tool for ethical conduct such as being a tool for charitable organizatons, fundraising actvites, etc.

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture