Clark refutes the extremes of the constructivists by

Info iconThis preview shows pages 14–16. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Clark refutes the extremes of the constructivists by both theoretical and empirical arguments. Theoretically he (45) defines “technology” in terms of rela- tionships between social and technical variables. Attempts to reduce the meaning of technology to cold, hard metal are bound to fail, for machinery (50) is just scrap unless it is organized functionally and supported by approp- riate systems of operation and main- tenance. At the empirical level Clark shows how a change at the telephone (55) exchange from maintenance-intensive electromechanical switches to semi- electronic switching systems altered work tasks, skills, training opportuni- ties, administration, and organization of (60) workers. Some changes Clark attrib- utes to the particular way management and labor unions negotiated the intro- duction of the technology, whereas others are seen as arising from the (65) capabilities and nature of the technol- ogy itself. Thus Clark helps answer the question: “When is social choice decisive and when are the concrete characteristics of technology more important?”-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q25: 14 The primary purpose of the passage is to A. advocate a more positive attitude toward technological change B. discuss the implications for employees of the modernization of a telephone exchange C. consider a successful challenge to the constructivist view of technological change D. challenge the position of advocates of technological determinism E. suggest that the social causes of technological change should be studied in real situations Answer: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q26: The information in the passage suggests that Clark believes that which of the following would be true if social constructivism had not gained widespread acceptance? A. Businesses would be more likely to modernize without considering the social consequences of their actions. B. There would be greater understanding of the role played by technology in producing social change. C. Businesses would be less likely to understand the attitudes of employees affected by modernization. D. Modernization would have occurred at a slower rate. E. Technology would have played a greater part in determining the role of business in society. Answer: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q27: The author of the passage uses the expression “are supposed to” in lines 34-35 primarily in order to A. suggest that a contention made by constructivists regarding determinists is inaccurate B. define the generally accepted position of determinists regarding the implementation of technology C. engage in speculation about the motivations of determinists D. lend support to a comment critical of the position of determinists E. contrast the historical position of determinists with their position regarding the exchange modernization Answer: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page14 / 22

Clark refutes the extremes of the constructivists by both...

This preview shows document pages 14 - 16. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online