BMO2004 Assessment 2 (1).docx

Morally right action is the one that provides the

Info icon This preview shows pages 2–4. Sign up to view the full content.

morally right action is the one that provides the greatest happiness for all those affected by the action (Shaw et al. 2013). This theory also speaks of increasing business profits without engaging in fraud or deception but has been critically reviewed for its narrow focus on creating stakeholder value alone. In this case, Coca-Cola was acting in a way of deception towards the consumer and general public, therefore, was acting in an unethical way. From the perspective of the company executives and employees, they were acting in favor of the GEBN financially, and influencing its outcomes and the organization’s directions. In turn, they would profit from the potential increase in sales and in turn job security. For this set of
Image of page 2

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

stakeholders, it would be a positive outcome- provided their actions went unnoticed. From the perspective of the members of the GEBN, their actions can be considered positive, since if their research was viewed as credible, then Coca-Cola’s profits would increase, and they would continue receiving funding, giving a positive image to Coke, as well as to themselves for publishing this research. The positive image that would have resulted, would have also benefited the universities that the GEBN members were a part of, through notoriety from research, if it was credible. The consumers of Coca-Cola products can be seen as the largest, broadest group of stakeholders that the decisions of Coke and the GEBN would affect. If the consumer feeds into the idea that drinking more soda and increasing their activity level is good for their health, then this would have a realistically negative impact on their health. It is even possible to consider this the absence of happiness in the long run, from the multitude of adverse side effects of drinking an increased amount of Coca-Cola. Other actions the company could have taken were to reach out to independent research agencies to look into its products, or to make consumers more aware that moderation is key when consuming their products. These alternative actions, would have excluded the creation of the GEBN, and would have had a negative impact on Coca-Cola despite the potential for honesty in research. Instead, they chose to deceive consumers by saying increasing caloric
Image of page 3
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
  • One '11
  • Ethics , deceptive advertising, company Coca-Cola, Sponsor Conflicted Research

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern