ELEC
Singapore Fire Safety Engineering Guidelines 2015_1.pdf

# Modelling for sensitivity dispute resolution 50

• 88

This preview shows pages 5–9. Sign up to view the full content.

Modelling for Sensitivity Analysis 50 7.4 Dispute Resolution 50 Chapter 8 8.0 Registered Inspectors 51 8.1.1 When is a Registered Inspector Required? 51 8.1..1(a) Inspection Certificate FORM 1 51 8.1..1(b) Inspection Certificate FORM 2 51

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

5 PART 2 Chapter 9 9.0 Method of assessment for common deviations 52 9.1 Common alternative solutions 52 9.1.1 Smoke Control [Enlarged smoke reservoir (Area, length), or Atrium design (Width, area)] or Enlarged Fire Compartment 52 9.1.2 Extended 2-way travel distance or Excessive egress capacity 56 9.1.3 Internal discharge of exit staircase. 59 9.1.4 Insufficient set back distances from notional boundary 63 9.1.5 Omission or Reduction of Fire rating of element of structure 64 9.1.6 Ductless Jet Fans (Non-compliance/s to FSR3:2008) 65 REFERENCES Annex A Methods of determining fire size Annex B Table of Fire Hazards Annex C Enclosure Fire Models Annex D Notification time Annex E Warning systems Annex F Pre-movement time Annex G Circular on Certification by QP for A/A Plans involving PB Fire Safety Designs. Annex H First Schedule of the Fire Safety (Registered Inspector) Regulations Annex I Determining Load/Capacity Ratio for Structural Steel TABLES Table 3.1 Design Fire Characteristics (Pre-Flashover) 20 Table 4.1 Constants relating to horizontal and stair travel 35 Table 4.2 Typical horizontal travel speeds for occupants of different mobility levels 36 Table 4.3 Typical travel speeds along staircase for occupants of different mobility levels 36 Table 4.4 Boundary layer width used to determine effective width 37
6 Smoke Control [Enlarged smoke reservoir (Area, length), or Atrium design (Width, area)] or Enlarged Fire Compartment Table 9.1 Design fires (sprinkler protected building) 54 Table 9.2 Fire size proposed by FSE based on DETACT T2, FPETool or Firecalc 54 Table 9.3 Tenability Limits 54 Table 9.4 Acceptance Criteria 55 Table 9.5 Determining RSET 55 Table 9.6 Sensitivity Analysis (ASET/RSET ≥ 1.2) 55 Extended 2-way travel distance or Inadequate egress capacity Table 9.7 Design fires (sprinkler protected) 57 Table 9.8 Fire size proposed by FSE based on DETACT T2, FPETool or Firecalc 58 Table 9.9 Tenability Limits 58 Table 9.10 Acceptance Criteria 58 Table 9.11 Determining RSET 58 Table 9.12 Sensitivity Analysis (ASET/RSET ≥ 1.2) 59 Internal discharge of exit staircase not compliant with clause 2.3.3 (c) of the Fire Code. Table 9.13 Design fires (sprinkler protected) 61 Table 9.14 Fire size proposed by FSE based on DETACT T2, FPETool or Firecalc 61 Table 9.15 Tenability Limits 61 Table 9.16 Acceptance Criteria 61 Table 9.17 Determining RSET 62 Table 9.18 Sensitivity Analysis (ASET/RSET ≥ 1.2) 62 Insufficient set back distance from notional boundary Table 9.19 Design fires (sprinkler protected) 63 Table 9.20 Acceptance Criteria 63 Table 9.21 Sensitivity Analysis 64 Omission or Reduction of Fire rating of element of structure Table 9.22 Design fires (sprinkler protected) 65 Table 9.23 Acceptance Criteria 65

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

7 Ductless Jet Fans (Non-compliance/s to FSR3:2008) Table 9.24 Design fires (sprinkler protected) 66 Table 9.25 Acceptance Criteria 66 FIGURES Figure 1.1 Performance-Based Framework 10 Figure 3.1 Spill Plume 18 Figure 3.2 Tenability criteria to be sampled at 2.5m from
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
• Three '18
• Dr. Anthony
• Microelectronics, Active fire protection, Fire protection, Computational fluid dynamics, Heat release rate, FSE

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern