Internal audit units should be examined for their

Internal audit units should be examined for their efficiency, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness
in this line.
10

Opening up collaborations between the audit team and company leaders to find emerging risks
and opportunities is another practical strategy to improve internal audit operations. Internal audit
professionals use their accounting and corporate governance backgrounds, as well as their
curiosity and business knowledge, to ask business leaders the kinds of questions that few, if any,
others are asking. Different departments within a company rarely have the opportunity to swap
notes. As a result, one business may be unaware of a potential danger that has the potential to
negatively impact them. The internal audit team can bring to the surface key issues while helping
decision-makers prioritize some of the most serious problems by knowing everyone’s top
concerns and risks through meaningful dialogues.
Internal audit risk assessment is another practical technique to improve internal audit operations
at the municipality. As a result, for internal audit departments that do not yet have a risk
assessment, the first step in improving their operations is self-evident. Many internal audit
departments use the SOX risk assessment to guide their internal audit plan, but others do not.
Perhaps this is due to the fact that many CAEs come from a traditional accounting background,
or because stakeholders are unaware of the entire spectrum of Internal Audit’s capabilities.
Internal auditing, as defined by the Institute of Internal Auditors, is the process of assisting a firm
in achieving its goals. Meeting stakeholder expectations, expanding revenues and market share,
innovating on new products and services, achieving new initiatives, and managing human
resources are all mission crucial objectives for a typical C-suite executive. Internal Audit will
need to acquire buy-in from its stakeholders before focusing its resources on these areas. The
simplest way to gain buy-in is to change the risk assessment method. Risk identification,
assessment, and reporting are all aspects of most internal audit risk assessments.
11

Many explain key business processes in the organization, evaluate the chance risk events could
occur, and analyze the consequences if those risk events happened. Some go so far as to measure
how quickly the impact would be felt (velocity) and how often (frequency) the impact would
occur over a period of time (persistence) (persistence). However, the problem with this method is
that many of these risks are already known to management; otherwise, there would be no
systems in place to handle them. Internal auditors should aim to understand their organization’s
core objectives, the strategies in place to achieve those objectives, and the processes in place to
support those strategies, rather than focusing first on business processes. This will assist in
identifying the most critical processes as well as highlighting new developing hazards that have
not previously been considered. Fortunately, this is a rather simple task.