Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy | Study Guide

Joseph A. Schumpeter

Download a PDF to print or study offline.

Study Guide
Cite This Study Guide

How to Cite This Study Guide

quotation mark graphic
MLA

Bibliography

Course Hero. "Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy Study Guide." Course Hero. 26 Apr. 2019. Web. 6 Aug. 2020. <https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Capitalism-Socialism-and-Democracy/>.

In text

(Course Hero)

APA

Bibliography

Course Hero. (2019, April 26). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy Study Guide. In Course Hero. Retrieved August 6, 2020, from https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Capitalism-Socialism-and-Democracy/

In text

(Course Hero, 2019)

Chicago

Bibliography

Course Hero. "Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy Study Guide." April 26, 2019. Accessed August 6, 2020. https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Capitalism-Socialism-and-Democracy/.

Footnote

Course Hero, "Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy Study Guide," April 26, 2019, accessed August 6, 2020, https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Capitalism-Socialism-and-Democracy/.

Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy | Part 3, Chapter 18 : Can Socialism Work? (The Human Element) | Summary

Share
Share

Summary

Schumpeter anticipates an argument from opponents of socialism that the system could work only in hopelessly ideal circumstances and that "human nature" means it could never work. Schumpeter thinks there is something to this argument. Because social systems exist in specific historical circumstances, socialism can work only in a society that has been structured and conditioned for it to exist.

Socialism can, moreover, recondition society, for example by absorbing and reorienting the minds of the bourgeois class. Schumpeter believes this reorientation of the bourgeoisie will be the hardest task for the socialist regime—partly because socialists might not recognize that it would be to their advantage. Such a process could be undertaken by setting up systems of selection for work based on aptitude. Aptitude-based work selection is a vital component of another necessary process Schumpeter identifies: transforming the bureaucracy into something vital and useful to a socialist society.

Finally, Schumpeter considers the functions of saving and discipline presently "discharged by the bourgeoisie." In a socialist system, saving is simply replaced by the socialist central authority. Indeed, it is exceeded by such an authority, as the Russian experience shows. Likewise for discipline. Moreover, the socialist order could command the "moral allegiance" so lacking for capitalism. Schumpeter delves into this further by considering the Soviet Union's lessons in "authoritarian discipline in socialism."

Analysis

Schumpeter's answer to those who claim socialism could not work because of, broadly, "human nature" is of course that socialism would create its own culture and condition people to accept it and run it. Capitalism had performed the same task. Schumpeter's favor for the bourgeoisie is already evident by this point, but he stretches it perhaps to breaking point in his expectation that a socialist society could (even unwillingly) integrate and recondition the bourgeoisie. Also, his preference for the bourgeoisie rests slightly uncomfortably on his belief in variation in human intellectual capacity, implying that the bourgeoisie necessarily represented the "best minds."

Cite This Study Guide

information icon Have study documents to share about Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy? Upload them to earn free Course Hero access!

Stuck? We have tutors online 24/7 who can help you get unstuck.
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes